IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Zero as ospfIfRetransInterval

Jeff Parker <jparker@AXIOWAVE.COM> Tue, 24 June 2003 13:25 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA15298 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:25:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <13.00A2DDDE@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 9:25:34 -0400
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 46459075 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:25:33 -0400
Received: from 64.115.125.242 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:25:33 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Message-ID: <EB5FFC72F183D411B38200062957342903ED6080@r2d2.axiowave.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:25:29 -0400
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Jeff Parker <jparker@AXIOWAVE.COM>
Subject: Re: Zero as ospfIfRetransInterval
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Precedence: list

You're not allowed to change the syntax unless
it's equivalent to the old syntax. So in this
case, we would need to deprecate/obsolete.
-Dan

Dan -
        You are such a wet blanket

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status