Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notification for draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag-00.txt
Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net> Mon, 21 October 2013 19:13 UTC
Return-Path: <shraddha@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E7C611E83BD for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:13:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TFKeV63Gh70L for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:13:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from va3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (va3ehsobe006.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D1011E8242 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail159-va3-R.bigfish.com (10.7.14.254) by VA3EHSOBE008.bigfish.com (10.7.40.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:12:44 +0000
Received: from mail159-va3 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail159-va3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD50C30014E; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:12:43 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.240.101; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:BL2PRD0510HT005.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -28
X-BigFish: VPS-28(zz98dI9371I936eI1454I146fIc430I542I1432I4015I14ffIzz1f42h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzc2hz1de098h1033IL17326ah8275dh1de097h186068hz2fh2a8h839h944hd24hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1d07h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1de9h1dfeh1dffh1e1dh1fe8h1ff5h9a9j1155h)
Received-SPF: pass (mail159-va3: domain of juniper.net designates 157.56.240.101 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.101; envelope-from=shraddha@juniper.net; helo=BL2PRD0510HT005.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ;
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(52314003)(24454002)(53754006)(51704005)(502244003)(13464003)(52044002)(164054003)(199002)(189002)(377454003)(377424004)(19580395003)(83322001)(56776001)(54316002)(19580405001)(81686001)(80022001)(66066001)(80976001)(46102001)(63696002)(65816001)(76482001)(69226001)(81816001)(51856001)(15975445006)(81342001)(79102001)(77982001)(59766001)(81542001)(74316001)(74706001)(74876001)(1941001)(15202345003)(83072001)(74366001)(74502001)(47446002)(85306002)(74662001)(31966008)(76796001)(4396001)(76576001)(49866001)(56816003)(47736001)(76786001)(33646001)(50986001)(47976001)(53806001)(77096001)(54356001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR05MB141; H:BY2PR05MB127.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; CLIP:116.197.178.83; FPR:; RD:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:;
Received: from mail159-va3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail159-va3 (MessageSwitch) id 1382382761411339_23965; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:12:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from VA3EHSMHS046.bigfish.com (unknown [10.7.14.226]) by mail159-va3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E89E4E004A; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:12:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BL2PRD0510HT005.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.101) by VA3EHSMHS046.bigfish.com (10.7.99.56) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:12:41 +0000
Received: from BY2PR05MB141.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.39.148) by BL2PRD0510HT005.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.100.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.371.2; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:12:40 +0000
Received: from BY2PR05MB127.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.38.24) by BY2PR05MB141.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.39.148) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.800.7; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:12:37 +0000
Received: from BY2PR05MB127.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.230]) by BY2PR05MB127.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.230]) with mapi id 15.00.0785.001; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:12:36 +0000
From: Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net>
To: Acee Lindem <acee@lindem.com>, Hannes Gredler <hannes@juniper.net>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notification for draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHOznHdHMmWlADk7k+I4LaGZmh7PZn/ggyw
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:12:36 +0000
Message-ID: <a7c6d5f6d71843749315fec9fd204282@BY2PR05MB127.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20131021105352.29409.44644.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0cda3481d5ba41afaf0c61a5bc434b40@BY2PR05MB127.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <94A203EA12AECE4BA92D42DBFFE0AE470309FF23@eusaamb101.ericsson.se> <75E8F047-BCC2-44AA-8EAC-B9C70226A308@juniper.net> <94A203EA12AECE4BA92D42DBFFE0AE47030A00A0@eusaamb101.ericsson.se> <20131021135153.GA7872@juniper.net> <94A203EA12AECE4BA92D42DBFFE0AE47030A027F@eusaamb101.ericsson.se> <20131021150847.GA7980@juniper.net> <A3679221-7FFC-4CE2-81C1-4E391619AC93@lindem.com>
In-Reply-To: <A3679221-7FFC-4CE2-81C1-4E391619AC93@lindem.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [116.197.178.83]
x-forefront-prvs: 00064751B6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
Cc: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>, Rob Shakir <rob.shakir@bt.com>, Harish Raghuveer <hraghuveer@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notification for draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:13:34 -0000
<Acee> Actually, I think separate LSAs is a better alternative. <Shraddha> Node-tag is a just another property of the node. OSPFv2/v3 have achieved the desired functionality using numerous link/node properties using TLVs in TE-LSA so I don't see an absolute necessity of going with a new LSA. Rgds Shraddha -----Original Message----- From: ospf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 8:55 PM To: Hannes Gredler Cc: OSPF List; Rob Shakir; Harish Raghuveer Subject: Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notification for draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag-00.txt On Oct 21, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Hannes Gredler wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:10:04PM +0000, Acee Lindem wrote: > | > | On Oct 21, 2013, at 9:51 AM, Hannes Gredler wrote: > | > | On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 01:32:54PM +0000, Acee Lindem wrote: > | | Hannes, > | | > | | On Oct 21, 2013, at 9:26 AM, Hannes Gredler wrote: > | | > | | > acee, > | | > > | | > why should we give an upper boundary on things which > | | > - might be subject to change and > | | > - which have a historic track record of being underestimated. > | | > | | You don't have to - just request a separate OSPFv2 opaque LSA and > | IPv6 OSPFv3 LSA from IANA. > | | Another alternative would be to extend the RI LSA to be multi- > | instance and relegate the variable length tags to an instance other > | than instance 0. > | > | again the question why i do have to ? > | i can perfectly fit in single-digit as well as a few dozens of colors > | in a single RI LSA > | - what is your concern - except that we may use inappropriate large > | space for TE ? > | any reasonable implementation SHOULD restrict the node color set, > | such > | that overwhelming the 64K of RI LSPs is not going to happen. > | > | We don't want a standard that leaves room for > | "unreasonable" implementations ;^). I think the policy in > | RFC 4970 is clear. Here is an > | excerpt: > > oh boy - i wish i could let the non-sense disappear just with good > standard docs ;-) - but i hear you - so all you're asking for is an > upper boundary ? - is 128 low enough to not scare you and be compliant > to the below paragraph. Actually, I think separate LSAs is a better alternative. > > | 3. Router Information LSA Opaque Usage and Applicability > | > | The purpose of the Router Information (RI) LSA is to advertise > | information relating to the aggregate OSPF router. Normally, this > | should be confined to TLVs with a single value or very few values. > | It is not meant to be a generic container to carry any and all > | information. The intent is to both limit the size of the RI LSA to > | the point where an OSPF router will always be able to contain the > | TLVs in a single LSA and to keep the task of determining what has > | changed between LSA instances reasonably simple. Hence, discretion > | and sound engineering judgment will need to be applied when deciding > | whether newly proposed TLV(s) in support of a new application are > | advertised in the RI LSA or warrant the creation of an application > | specific LSA. > | > | > | Anyway, this hasn't even been presented or accepted as a WG document. > > which is not a reason why we should not discuss how to iron out the bumpy parts now. Right. Thanks, Acee > > thanks ! > > /hannes > > | | > the 'per-link' admin-groups serve as a good example here: > | | > initially conceived as "you won't ever need more than > | 32" we have > | | > now arrived at a variable length (unbounded) extension. > | | > > | | > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-osborne-mpls-extended-admin- > | groups-00 > | | > > | | > for a humorous take to it, have a look at > | | > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1925 > | | > rule (9) and (10) > | | > > | | > /hannes > | | > > | | > On Oct 21, 2013, at 3:12 PM, Acee Lindem wrote: > | | > > | | >> Hi Shraddha, > | | >> Since the size of the tag data is unbounded, could you either > | put it in a separate OSPFv2 opaque LSA and OSPFv3 LSA or limit the > | size to some maximum number of tags, e.g., 16? > | | >> Thanks, > | | >> Acee > | | >> On Oct 21, 2013, at 7:05 AM, Shraddha Hegde wrote: > | | >> > | | >>> Hi All, > | | >>> > | | >>> We have posted a draft on " Advertising per-node > | administrative tags in OSPF" and would like to hear your views > | on it. Please feel free to raise any suggestion/comment on the > | content. > | | >>> > | | >>> Rgds > | | >>> Shraddha > | | >>> > | | >>> -----Original Message----- > | | >>> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet- > | drafts@ietf.org] > | | >>> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 4:24 PM > | | >>> To: Harish Raghuveer; Shraddha Hegde; British Telecom; Hannes > | Gredler; Rob Shakir > | | >>> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-hegde-ospf-node- > | admin-tag-00.txt > | | >>> > | | >>> > | | >>> A new version of I-D, draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag-00.txt > | | >>> has been successfully submitted by Shraddha Hegde and posted to > | the IETF repository. > | | >>> > | | >>> Filename: draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag > | | >>> Revision: 00 > | | >>> Title: Advertising per-node administrative tags in OSPF > | | >>> Creation date: 2013-10-21 > | | >>> Group: Individual Submission > | | >>> Number of pages: 6 > | | >>> URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft- > | hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag-00.txt > | | >>> Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hegde- > | ospf-node-admin-tag > | | >>> Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hegde-ospf- > | node-admin-tag-00 > | | >>> > | | >>> > | | >>> Abstract: > | | >>> This document describes an extension to OSPF protocol [RFC2328] > | to > | | >>> add an optional operational capability, that allows tagging and > | | >>> grouping of the nodes in an OSPF domain. This allows > | | >>> simplification,ease of management and control over route and > | path > | | >>> selection based on configured policies. > | | >>> > | | >>> This document describes the protocol extensions to disseminate > | per- > | | >>> node admin-tags to the OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 protocols. > | | >>> > | | >>> > | | >>> > | | >>> > | | >>> > | | >>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time > | of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at > | tools.ietf.org. > | | >>> > | | >>> The IETF Secretariat > | | >>> > | | >>> > | | >>> > | | >>> _______________________________________________ > | | >>> OSPF mailing list > | | >>> OSPF@ietf.org > | | >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf > | | >> > | | >> _______________________________________________ > | | >> OSPF mailing list > | | >> OSPF@ietf.org > | | >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf > | | >> > | | >> > | | > > | | > > | | > | | > | | > | > | > > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > OSPF@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
- [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notification f… Shraddha Hegde
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Hannes Gredler
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Hannes Gredler
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Hannes Gredler
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Shraddha Hegde
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Shraddha Hegde
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Anton Smirnov
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Hannes Gredler
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Anton Smirnov
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notificati… Hannes Gredler