[OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt]
Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com> Tue, 10 October 2006 21:03 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXOl2-0006Y2-CN; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:03:24 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXOl0-0006Xq-Ok; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:03:22 -0400
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.102.122.148]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXOkz-00070W-Ff; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:03:22 -0400
Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Oct 2006 14:03:21 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,291,1157353200"; d="scan'208"; a="45564425:sNHT75748880"
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-core-1.cisco.com [64.102.124.12]) by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k9AL3LPF000622; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:03:21 -0400
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k9AL3LYJ008944; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:03:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:03:20 -0400
Received: from [10.82.224.123] ([10.82.224.123]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:03:20 -0400
Message-ID: <452C0A97.5010501@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:03:19 -0400
From: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jean Philippe Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>
References: <C12AE018.896F0%dward@cisco.com> <452C089D.5090204@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <452C089D.5090204@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Oct 2006 21:03:20.0622 (UTC) FILETIME=[8417C4E0:01C6ECAF]
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=2379; t=1160514201; x=1161378201; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=acee@cisco.com; z=From:Acee=20Lindem=20<acee@cisco.com> |Subject:Re=3A=20[Fwd=3A=20[mpls]=20WG=20Last=20Call=20on=20draft-ietf-mpls-numbe r-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt] |To:Jean=20Philippe=20Vasseur=20<jvasseur@cisco.com>; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3Dv8FxVGcUsEpRLhXR761boAs862s=3D; b=TUgN47ymFlXgFDkDPsX1S+iKcFCAh4v20rW/pWiBWOQ348OqpV7YkPJD0YG8fPIqC+8t38vq wm1rWxcnTIpq4J+35c7S0IUOaRO4afS6AtQwjKQNb1gzj5zT2oZd+TPj;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com; header.From=acee@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b280b4db656c3ca28dd62e5e0b03daa8
Cc: George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>, rtg-dir@ietf.org, isis-wg@ietf.org, ospf@ietf.org, David Ward <dward@cisco.com>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se>
Subject: [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt]
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ospf-bounces@ietf.org
JP, One more comment - Please write the document so that it can apply to OSPFv3 TE as well. The existing draft can be an informative reference (draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-traffic-07.txt) Thanks, Acee Acee Lindem wrote: > I've reviewed the subject document and don't have any comments on it > from the perspective of the OSPF WG. However, I have the following > comments as a member of the routing directorate (copying JP): > > 1. Why the cryptic sub-TLV name? RFC 3630 doesn't define short > cryptic names for sub-TLVs so I don't really see why you've defined > NB-0-BW-LSP? Why not just call it the Unconstrained LSP Count > sub-TLV? > Or at least come up with a better short name :^), e.g. > BW-0-LSP-CNT. > 2. How did you arrive at 19 for the suggested value for the sub-TLV > type? I checked > IANA and 18 is the next available. I may be missing a document > though. > 3. Do you want to reserve a value (e.g., 0xffffffff) to indicate no > unconstrained > LSPs are to traverse a given link. > 4. Nit - in section 4, replace "OSPF LSA" with "OSPF LSAs" and "ISIS > LSP" > with "ISIS LSPs". > > Thanks, > Acee > > David Ward wrote: >> Do you want our WG to review? Co-Last Call (as we have for other WG that >> affect our protocol)? Do you have a desired date for end of last call >> from >> the IGPs? >> >> Thanks >> >> -DWard >> >> >> On 9/4/06 5:01 AM, "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.se> wrote: >> >> >>> All, >>> >>> the MPLS working group want to notify the ospf and is-s >>> working groups, as well as the routing directorate that >>> we are currently doing a wg last call on >>> draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt. >>> >>> Loa and George >>> >>> >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> Subject: [mpls] WG Last Call on >>> draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt >>> Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 10:08:10 +0200 >>> From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se> >>> Organization: Acreo AB >>> To: mpls@ietf.org >>> >>> Working Group, >>> >>> this initiates a two week working group last call on >>> draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt >>> >>> The wg last call ends on September 17. >>> >>> Please send comments to the working group mailing list and/or >>> the working group chairs. >>> >>> /Loa and George >>> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
- [OSPF] [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-mp… Acee Lindem
- [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-iet… Acee Lindem
- [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-iet… Acee Lindem
- [OSPF] Re: [Isis-wg] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Cal… JP Vasseur
- [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-iet… JP Vasseur
- [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-iet… Acee Lindem
- [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-iet… JP Vasseur
- [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-iet… Acee Lindem
- [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-iet… JP Vasseur
- Re: [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft… Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft… JP Vasseur
- Re: [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft… Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft… JP Vasseur