Re: [OSPF] OSPF HMAC Cryptographic Authentication

"Phil Cowburn" <phil.cowburn@gmail.com> Tue, 25 July 2006 23:49 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5Wef-0005Kn-Ae; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:49:37 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5Wee-0005Ki-4S for ospf@ietf.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:49:36 -0400
Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.171]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5Wec-000705-Rg for ospf@ietf.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:49:36 -0400
Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so3091919uge for <ospf@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HzXnRccP8zWwoFPdJ4DnBLjiiYGRPR7ouvmYGLPJzbHVg8DjkzlDWYMT3oSBM7cCFb2H9P5FhvqZRSBTTfru3+P/faU/WQDGXUysiFuKuB2FXjgL5olxjpie/iv7Nm/GC+arnjbM1paUCrskPBwme2dxzJf8OiOgZggNDUwZr1E=
Received: by 10.82.109.19 with SMTP id h19mr185091buc; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.82.138.20 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <6e6ce9380607251649n27bfa242r45f6ee06211e6e1b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 05:19:33 +0530
From: Phil Cowburn <phil.cowburn@gmail.com>
To: Manav Bhatia <manav_bhatia06@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF HMAC Cryptographic Authentication
In-Reply-To: <20060725143433.18777.qmail@web25411.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <6e6ce9380607212051j5dbb9362q174cbf425a8b566e@mail.gmail.com> <20060725143433.18777.qmail@web25411.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e5ba305d0e64821bf3d8bc5d3bb07228
Cc: ospf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ospf-bounces@ietf.org

Manav:

>
=> RFC 2104 has the C code that allows the text being hashed to be of
an arbitary =length; the only restriction imposed is that the length
must be a multiple of 8 bits =(octet). If you look at
draft-eastlake-sha2-02.txt then it allows the text to be =hashed to
contain an arbitary number of bits.

Its been a long time since i read 2104 and i remembered that there
used to be some limitation. I was under the impression that it only
worked for a fixed length of input text T. Clearly, I was mistaken.

=>
=> Similarly, the code in RFC 3174 is a "byte-level"implementation.
The same draft =allows the text to be of an arbitary length. It adds
to the RFC 3174 API an =additional call,
=> SHA1FinalBits(), that lets the remaining bits to be added to the hash.
=>
=> I would prefer to refer to this draft as it (i) has full support
for all the SHA2 =algorithms and (ii) adds HMAC support for both SHA1
and SHA2 algorithms.

I am okay as long as you reference some document for HMAC and SHA algorithms.

Phil

=>
=> Thanks,
=> Manav
=>

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf