[P2PSIP] 答复: Re: WG Call for adoption: draft-peng-p2psip-snmp-04

Hi Marc,

Thanks a lot for your feedback. For the MIB issues, experts from SNMP area 
asked us to add basic MIB information at #82 meeting. We argued that our 
draft is mainly for describing the SNMP over RELOAD mechanism, so that MIB 
definition is not necessary. After discussion at the meeting, it is agreed 
that only a minimum set of MIBs needs to defined in this draft. 
The SNMP over RELOAD draft covers both the P2PSIP and SNMP area. It might 
be difficult for P2P experts or SNMP experts to fully understand the 
mechanism to find the network manager using RELOAD. We will try to improve 
the writing on this part by adding more cross reference and giving more 
details. We look forward to your comments in this part and will improve 
the draft accordingly.
We think most issues regarding to the draft are minor and the draft is 
mature enough to be adopted. We will consistently put efforts in improving 
the draft after it gets adopted and attracts more attention from people 
outside the workgroup.

***************************************
Email：        peng.yonglin@zte.com.cn
TEL：          025-52871543
Mobile：       13776637274
Fax：          025-52872187
***************************************

Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org> 
发件人:  p2psip-bounces@ietf.org
2012-07-03 23:25

收件人
cjbc@it.uc3m.es
抄送
p2psip-chairs@tools.ietf.org, p2psip@ietf.org
主题
Re: [P2PSIP] WG Call for adoption: draft-peng-p2psip-snmp-04

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

I read this draft and I am not sure that it is ready for adoption as 
working
group item.  The draft seems to be doing 2 different things, 1) defining a 
MIB
for RELOAD and 2) using RELOAD to find the network manager.  For 1) I 
think
that the MIB as defined exposes only a very small set of data, and needs 
to be
extended.  For 2) I must say that I do not really understand the 
mechanism.

So this draft needs more work but I am not sure what WG adoption will get 
us.
 The energy in the WG is very low, and I think that this energy should be
better used WGLCing the existing WG drafts (as promised back in Quebec 
City),
and adopting drafts that are in better shape, like SHARE/DISCO.

Meanwhile I am willing to do a complete review of the document some time 
in
the future.

On 06/21/2012 06:06 AM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> In Paris, there was a hum asking the group for consensus to move towards 

> adopting the RELOAD SNMP draft as a working group item.
> 
> This email starts a 2-week consensus call on adopting
> 
> Title           : An SNMP Usage for RELOAD Author(s)       : YongLin 
Peng 
> Wei Wang ZhenWu Hao Yu Meng Filename        :
> draft-peng-p2psip-snmp-04.txt Pages           : 24 Date            :
> 2012-03-06
> 
> as a P2PSIP WG document. Please, read the current revision and state you 

> opinion either for or against adoption (and with reasoning why) in the 
> mailing list. The call for adoption ends 5th July 2012.
> 
> Brian & Carlos
> 

- -- 
Marc Petit-Huguenin
Email: marc@petit-huguenin.org
Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org
Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=x/pD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
P2PSIP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip

--------------------------------------------------------
ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail (and any attachment transmitted herewith) is privileged and confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s).  If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of the information contained is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this mail in error, please delete it and notify us immediately.