Re: [P2PSIP] WG Call for adoption: draft-peng-p2psip-snmp-04

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> Fri, 29 June 2012 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72B8821F87EC for <p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 09:49:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.125
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.125 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.126, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_21=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FaG9YGAaPGW7 for <p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 09:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E45721F87F7 for <p2psip@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 09:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sjc-vpn5-823.cisco.com (unknown [128.107.239.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF75A22E253; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:49:46 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <1340284009.11077.148.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 09:48:31 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7FDBFF95-4CB2-45FB-B2D6-DE21D3BE4BEF@iii.ca>
References: <1340284009.11077.148.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es>
To: cjbc@it.uc3m.es
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Cc: p2psip-chairs@tools.ietf.org, p2psip@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] WG Call for adoption: draft-peng-p2psip-snmp-04
X-BeenThere: p2psip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Peer-to-Peer SIP working group discussion list <p2psip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/p2psip>
List-Post: <mailto:p2psip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:49:55 -0000

I've read this and it seems like it is ready for WG adoption. We don't plan to implement so I don't have a strong feeling one way or the other if the WG should adopt it but I certainly have no objections to it being adopted. 

Cullen

 
On Jun 21, 2012, at 6:06 , Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> In Paris, there was a hum asking the group for consensus to move towards
> adopting the RELOAD SNMP draft as a working group item.
> 
> This email starts a 2-week consensus call on adopting
> 
>        Title           : An SNMP Usage for RELOAD
>        Author(s)       : YongLin Peng
>                          Wei Wang
>                          ZhenWu Hao
>                          Yu Meng
>        Filename        : draft-peng-p2psip-snmp-04.txt
>        Pages           : 24
>        Date            : 2012-03-06
> 
> as a P2PSIP WG document. Please, read the current revision and state you
> opinion either for or against adoption (and with reasoning why) in the
> mailing list. The call for adoption ends 5th July 2012.
> 
> Brian & Carlos
> 
> -- 
> Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano     http://www.netcoms.net
>   GPG FP: D29B 0A6A 639A A561 93CA  4D55 35DC BA4D D170 4F67
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>                IEEE Network Special Issue on
>                  Video over Mobile Networks
> http://dl.comsoc.org/livepubs/ni/info/cfp/cfpnetwork0313.htm 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> _______________________________________________
> P2PSIP mailing list
> P2PSIP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip