IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pals] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw-03: (with COMMENT)

"Parag Jain (paragj)" <paragj@cisco.com> Wed, 30 August 2017 19:11 UTC

Return-Path: <paragj@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2337E1321DC; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 12:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uSLOSYuAn6Gb; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 12:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1E0C13219B; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 12:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3984; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1504120299; x=1505329899; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=MOe76oFKqgB6IY1MXTSxhuy83dicDqxe4kM+39LBJ9Y=; b=CLIMPKB38obffEEpFZ0DrkEW2EPCKCQmwqWBsjmr0kfIDjO4SCxXpNRw WHk+kIT2n629MTB5x4hATUclt9kakGmCe/3+/gnD8qv/XYyu5HzXgYXdS p4G1BGO/5ab+i23lsnoXRFp6AZbT2n77Yup/GUkFVSN3IKI/Wg2ungvYy 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DKAACQDadZ/49dJa1eGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1pkgRUHg3CKHpAemBgOggQhC4UbAhqEDT8YAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFGQIBAwEBIRE3AwsQAgEIGgImAgICJQsVEAIEAQ0FCYooEK0rgieLQwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR2BDYIdggKBToIOgn2EQgESAR8XgnwwgjEFigOOK4g+AodXjHOCElqFDYkpgUmWQgEfOIECC3cVSRIBhQUcGYFOdgGIWYEjAYEOAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,449,1498521600"; d="scan'208";a="71438185"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Aug 2017 19:11:38 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-001.cisco.com (xch-rtp-001.cisco.com [64.101.220.141]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v7UJBbeP015712 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 30 Aug 2017 19:11:38 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.220.141) by XCH-RTP-001.cisco.com (64.101.220.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 15:11:37 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-001.cisco.com ([64.101.220.141]) by XCH-RTP-001.cisco.com ([64.101.220.141]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 15:11:37 -0400
From: "Parag Jain (paragj)" <paragj@cisco.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw@ietf.org>, "pals-chairs@ietf.org" <pals-chairs@ietf.org>, "pals@ietf.org" <pals@ietf.org>, "stewart.bryant@gmail.com" <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Pals] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw-03: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHTIHCcFp+2yRI79kSETmbfDIJLqqKdRsEA
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 19:11:37 +0000
Message-ID: <8305704F-B36C-4AEE-B7BF-C578DE85CE05@cisco.com>
References: <150397460616.13187.9088547841072107137.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <150397460616.13187.9088547841072107137.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1a.0.160910
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [161.44.213.65]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <D269B3C5B5AA91459A05D34C6B18737A@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pals/LAlzOqcfsYyJ42LMBkz-gRTXWW8>
Subject: Re: [Pals] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw-03: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." <pals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pals/>
List-Post: <mailto:pals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 19:11:41 -0000

Hi Ben

I ran idnits on the draft and did not find any issues. Pls see the output below.

Thanks
Parag

idnits 2.14.01  /var/www/.idnits


tmp/draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping-05.txt:

  Checking boilerplate required by RFC 5378 and the IETF Trust (see
  http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info):
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

     No issues found here.

  Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/id-info/1id-guidelines.txt:
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

     No issues found here.

  Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist :
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

     No issues found here.

  Miscellaneous warnings:
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  -- The document date (August 21, 2017) is 9 days in the past.  Is this         ⇐ this is expected and nogt an issue.
     intentional?


  Checking references for intended status: Proposed Standard
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (See RFCs 3967 and 4897 for information about using normative references
     to lower-maturity documents in RFCs)

     No issues found here.

     Summary: 0 errors (**), 0 flaws (~~), 0 warnings (==), 1 comment (--).


On 2017-08-28, 10:43 PM, "Pals on behalf of Ben Campbell" <pals-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of ben@nostrum.com> wrote:

    Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
    draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw-03: No Objection
    
    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
    email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
    introductory paragraph, however.)
    
    
    Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
    for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
    
    
    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw/
    
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    COMMENT:
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Please check idnits. It flags some issues that should be resolved, especially
    2119 language issues.
    
    The security considerations seem inadequate. I'm no expert here, but it seems
    like adding p2mp support in addition to p2p support has a good chance of
    creating some new considerations. If it really doesn't, it would be helpful to
    see arguments to that effect.
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    Pals mailing list
    Pals@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email