[Pals] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw-03: (with COMMENT)

[Ben Campbell <[e-mail]>]

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw-03: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Please check idnits. It flags some issues that should be resolved, especially
2119 language issues.

The security considerations seem inadequate. I'm no expert here, but it seems
like adding p2mp support in addition to p2p support has a good chance of
creating some new considerations. If it really doesn't, it would be helpful to
see arguments to that effect.