IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pals] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection-04: (with COMMENT)

Yimin Shen <yshen@juniper.net> Fri, 16 December 2016 19:19 UTC

Return-Path: <yshen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0DE120725; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 11:19:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I_kA75FKsQeq; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 11:19:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM02-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-cys01nam02on0097.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.37.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C01E4129443; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 11:19:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=G0FO2TyOUvT3ZrHADldv8dp1AEYs6H+8PNR3DjBpkyM=; b=HsnxYGiPmrujZUedAQi5t1qR++aq/TrILkVN3oI17x5fQBMsTs9awcvlCdn94xkrtp371DQBI5vifCcHyjne10rua5PX+FWc69aPwrSfCQeDjS75RmGQGWGYh43WyFCKSDX3QBCFjZpwoTrA/gZSBvbswwT8JHv8sXtJLir7aDU=
Received: from BN3PR0501MB1554.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.161.217.144) by BN3PR0501MB1554.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.161.217.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.789.13; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 19:19:42 +0000
Received: from BN3PR0501MB1554.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.161.217.144]) by BN3PR0501MB1554.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.161.217.144]) with mapi id 15.01.0789.013; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 19:19:42 +0000
From: Yimin Shen <yshen@juniper.net>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection-04: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHSVtmc8WUJKot9Y0qZ734MsehDmaEKoS6A
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 19:19:41 +0000
Message-ID: <5D87056C-C1BD-4CC1-A04C-E219DBCCBB7B@juniper.net>
References: <148180957646.27574.2443055569199849290.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <148180957646.27574.2443055569199849290.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.18.0.160709
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=yshen@juniper.net;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.10]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 28beadc7-faab-4cae-623a-08d425e87cb0
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001); SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1554;
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3PR0501MB1554; 7:pZJ30tKYK7E1mxuELY41gdfdq2d6Op6m6Tpte4FeBogHzruSlfhwjlS/tYCn/vnGUvW1qZO/7Ww3KTN+ej64kGbJq54m+YzzYhj+XpNO8Nyx/sZMNqFoT8Kf7/yjvLcY+Ucyl/595hL8tQlybOoh7Unurpr+674JkukDWBSwchuMHatHTjRLOOCoemjMb/cmjn+x0rfD0zfLraqY462VMaQ2A/eaETUGbhuON/Gz1hcIGMiLl7UuXRZ0/hkJZyBk01xpxkhaODoUMB0+sZFAWSW5Of4ysNoBasRr5DE5+zRLuG3E+FFmnyDAwepbYlnhDcD1ZZtX0lc732KvHwvrvvLEyWj+szby1z7Yjk9Vz8SsPIGOc7LxSMX7gUU2X3IcT2t12tKBDLXGPXkZrSQtLuNGWGRAfPtDzrfEfXof4iQ+uSWVAE9+6eoFZzvOHGZ9qCUuzxlV7qp0roFK2kxm1A==
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN3PR0501MB15541A16C09CDBF7770BF020BD9C0@BN3PR0501MB1554.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105)(95692535739014);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123562025)(20161123564025)(20161123555025)(20161123560025)(6072148); SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1554; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1554;
x-forefront-prvs: 01583E185C
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(39840400002)(39860400002)(39450400003)(39850400002)(39410400002)(377454003)(199003)(189002)(24454002)(8936002)(4001350100001)(6506006)(6512006)(5660300001)(81156014)(66066001)(81166006)(36756003)(83506001)(230783001)(86362001)(189998001)(122556002)(2950100002)(5001770100001)(97736004)(8676002)(83716003)(82746002)(229853002)(50986999)(101416001)(3280700002)(38730400001)(2900100001)(54356999)(33656002)(3660700001)(68736007)(39060400001)(102836003)(6486002)(77096006)(106356001)(4326007)(76176999)(92566002)(2906002)(106116001)(6116002)(6436002)(25786008)(99286002)(3846002)(305945005)(7736002)(105586002)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1554; H:BN3PR0501MB1554.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <6F33B0D996B0854EBD3D2AF20BDE95A6@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Dec 2016 19:19:41.9806 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR0501MB1554
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pals/vBTeBH1BtRLEE0dXJZt1CckdlgI>
Cc: "draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection@ietf.org>, "pals-chairs@ietf.org" <pals-chairs@ietf.org>, "pals@ietf.org" <pals@ietf.org>, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, "wim.henderickx@nokia.com" <wim.henderickx@nokia.com>, "shares@ndzh.com" <shares@ndzh.com>
Subject: Re: [Pals] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." <pals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pals/>
List-Post: <mailto:pals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 19:19:46 -0000

Hi Benoit,

Thanks very much for your review and valuable comments! We will fix both nits in the next revision.

Thanks,

-- Yimin


On 12/15/16, 8:46 AM, "Benoit Claise" <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:

    Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
    draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection-04: No Objection
    
    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
    email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
    introductory paragraph, however.)
    
    
    Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
    for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
    
    
    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection/
    
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    COMMENT:
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Editorial nits (From Sue Hares, part of her OPS-DIR review)
    
    1.       Page 10  - style makes difficult reading of sentence  (very
    minor nit).
    
    OLD /A PLR MUST Be able to detect a failure by using a rapid mechanism,
    such as physical layer failure detection, Bidirectional failure detection
    (BFD) [RFC5880], etc. /
    
    NEW /A PLR MUST Be able to detect a failure by using a rapid mechanism,
    such as physical layer failure detection, Bidirectional failure detection
    (BFD) [RFC5880], and others/
    
    2.       Page 32 – difficult to parse sentence
    
          Old/For Encoding type, 1 is defined for PWid FEC element format,
    and 2 is defined for the Generalized PWid FEC Element format [RFC4447]./
    
          New/ For type encoding type, the following two values are defined
    within this document:
    
    -          Type 1 for PWid FEC element format (see section 6.4.1.), and
    
    -          Type 2 for Generalized PWid FEC Element format [RFC4447

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email