[Pals] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection-04: (with COMMENT)

"Benoit Claise" <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 15 December 2016 13:46 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pals@ietf.org
Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73648129647; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 05:46:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.39.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148180957646.27574.2443055569199849290.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 05:46:16 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pals/UkWUJchdRcPv74LQnb9XEz0g4Kc>
Cc: draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection@ietf.org, pals-chairs@ietf.org, shares@ndzh.com, pals@ietf.org, stewart.bryant@gmail.com
Subject: [Pals] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." <pals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pals/>
List-Post: <mailto:pals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 13:46:16 -0000

Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection-04: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Editorial nits (From Sue Hares, part of her OPS-DIR review)

1.       Page 10  - style makes difficult reading of sentence  (very
minor nit).

OLD /A PLR MUST Be able to detect a failure by using a rapid mechanism,
such as physical layer failure detection, Bidirectional failure detection
(BFD) [RFC5880], etc. /

NEW /A PLR MUST Be able to detect a failure by using a rapid mechanism,
such as physical layer failure detection, Bidirectional failure detection
(BFD) [RFC5880], and others/

2.       Page 32 – difficult to parse sentence

      Old/For Encoding type, 1 is defined for PWid FEC element format,
and 2 is defined for the Generalized PWid FEC Element format [RFC4447]./

      New/ For type encoding type, the following two values are defined
within this document:

-          Type 1 for PWid FEC element format (see section 6.4.1.), and

-          Type 2 for Generalized PWid FEC Element format [RFC4447