IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pana] AD review of draft-ietf-dhc-paa-option-04.txt

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 13 December 2006 10:24 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GuRHt-0000KE-PR; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 05:24:33 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GuRHs-0000Jr-EX for pana@ietf.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 05:24:32 -0500
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([193.234.218.130]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GuRHr-00033k-5M for pana@ietf.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 05:24:32 -0500
Received: from p130.piuha.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F1D898C4; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:24:30 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E4AC898C2; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:24:30 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <457FD4DE.6010707@piuha.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:24:30 +0200
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061117)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alper Yegin <alper.yegin@yegin.org>
Subject: Re: [Pana] AD review of draft-ietf-dhc-paa-option-04.txt
References: <0MKp2t-1Gppft3I77-0003sC@mrelay.perfora.net>
In-Reply-To: <0MKp2t-1Gppft3I77-0003sC@mrelay.perfora.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 08170828343bcf1325e4a0fb4584481c
Cc: 'MORAND Lionel RD-CORE-ISS' <lionel.morand@orange-ftgroup.com>, pana@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: pana@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol for carrying Authentication for Network Access <pana.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana>, <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:pana@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana>, <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: pana-bounces@ietf.org

> Would replacing the second sentence with the one below improve clarity?
>
> 	Presence of these DHCP options does not indicate PANA must be used
> in 
> 	the network.
>   
I prefer Lionel's text on this. If you wanted
to write it in the above way, I think you
should add also the part about lack of
these options not indicating PANA is
not needed.

--Jari


_______________________________________________
Pana mailing list
Pana@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email