IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pana] status of wg documents

<Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com> Fri, 05 June 2009 15:57 UTC

Return-Path: <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: pana@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pana@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BA443A6C54 for <pana@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 08:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nMRUbaTBFgr8 for <pana@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 08:57:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-mx06.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.122.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B0453A6C86 for <pana@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 08:57:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh105.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.211]) by mgw-mx06.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.6/Switch-3.2.6) with ESMTP id n55Fuq99000495; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 18:57:05 +0300
Received: from vaebh104.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.160.244.30]) by esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 5 Jun 2009 18:57:01 +0300
Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.5]) by vaebh104.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 5 Jun 2009 18:56:55 +0300
Received: from NOK-EUMSG-03.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.108]) by nok-am1mhub-01.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.5]) with mapi; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:56:54 +0200
From: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
To: jari.arkko@piuha.net, pana@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:57:04 +0200
Thread-Topic: [Pana] status of wg documents
Thread-Index: AcnkPXsChgXHf8IpS2W7KPy6mUW1YwBuMoIT
Message-ID: <C64EAA80.29CA0%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A265CB7.3020001@piuha.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jun 2009 15:56:55.0606 (UTC) FILETIME=[400CB560:01C9E5F6]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Subject: Re: [Pana] status of wg documents
X-BeenThere: pana@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol for carrying Authentication for Network Access <pana.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana>, <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pana>
List-Post: <mailto:pana@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana>, <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:57:11 -0000

Hi Jari,


On 6/3/09 6:21 AM, "ext Jari Arkko" <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote:

> 
> Draft-ietf-pana-ipsec: what's up with this? If I remember correctly, we
> talked about finding an editor and there were some volunteers. Has a
> decision been reached on who is doing the edits? Secondly, we talked
> about what needs to be done with the draft, and at least one issue was
> identified about the selection of keys. I have not seen a conclusion
> from this thread, nor any updates to the draft. Are we ready to make the
> conclusion, or is more discussion needed? Can people go through the
> draft identify other remaining issues?

Regarding this I-D, I do not believe there is sufficient interest or energy
to complete the work. Hence rather than being bogged down in the process of
updating the I-D and progressing it, it would be best to drop this I-D from
the WG charter and let it expire. I will send another note to the ML and
ensure there is consensus on this decision.

-Raj

> 
> Jari
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pana mailing list
> Pana@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email