Re: [payload] Interest in raft-ietf-avt-rtp-isac
"Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming@digium.com> Thu, 08 March 2012 16:10 UTC
Return-Path: <kpfleming@digium.com>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A6321F851C for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 08:10:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DztIAEew3Npc for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 08:10:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.digium.com (mail.digium.com [216.207.245.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841A521F8505 for <payload@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 08:10:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.24.55.203] (helo=zimbra.hsv.digium.com) by mail.digium.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <kpfleming@digium.com>) id 1S5fvQ-0002R9-5V; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 10:10:44 -0600
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.hsv.digium.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B2C6D8006; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 10:10:44 -0600 (CST)
Received: from zimbra.hsv.digium.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.hsv.digium.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9HJGN03LRwof; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 10:10:43 -0600 (CST)
Received: from [10.24.250.46] (unknown [10.24.250.46]) by zimbra.hsv.digium.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93A85D8004; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 10:10:43 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <4F58DA03.2010503@digium.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 10:10:43 -0600
From: "Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming@digium.com>
Organization: Digium, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
References: <C15918F2FCDA0243A7C919DA7C4BE9940B549C@xmb-rcd-x01-p.cisco.com> <4F4F59B7.907@alvestrand.no> <4F4FA94D.4090508@digium.com> <4F58D942.3060603@alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <4F58D942.3060603@alvestrand.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: payload@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [payload] Interest in raft-ietf-avt-rtp-isac
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/payload>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 16:10:49 -0000
On 03/08/2012 10:07 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote: > I've queried within Google, and we're going to resurrect the draft. > It'll be a while still until we manage to get the information about 32 > kHz sample rate added, sorry. No problem. Based on experiments it looks pretty easy to support 32kHz mode anyway. > > Harald > > On 03/01/2012 05:52 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: >> On 03/01/2012 05:12 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote: >>> On 02/27/2012 09:09 PM, Ali C. Begen (abegen) wrote: >>>> WG, >>>> >>>> We have a milestone for this draft and we passed the target date some >>>> time ago. AFAICT, the current draft has expired and there was no >>>> continued work on this draft. I wonder whether the WG still has >>>> interest in finishing this work. Please reply to this email (cc'ing >>>> the payload list) if you have an interest/desire in seeing this >>>> document finished. >>>> >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avt-rtp-isac/ >>> I have checked with the relevant ex-Gips team (now Google), and it seems >>> that we don't have any particular reason to make this a high priority at >>> the moment. It's stable code. >>> >>> Do other participants see a benefit in having this spec published as an >>> RFC? >> >> At the request of a community member, I've just started working on >> adding support for iSAC passthrough in Asterisk, and while >> investigating it I learned that Chrome can currently generate/accept >> offers with iSAC at 32kHz sample rate, which is not included in this >> draft. >> >> If Google is going to continue to distribute iSAC support in products >> (and others are as well), I'd be happy to see this draft updated to >> match the current state of deployments and get pushed towards >> publication. >> > -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies Jabber: kfleming@digium.com | SIP: kpfleming@digium.com | Skype: kpfleming 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
- [payload] Interest in raft-ietf-avt-rtp-isac Ali C. Begen (abegen)
- Re: [payload] Interest in raft-ietf-avt-rtp-isac Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [payload] Interest in raft-ietf-avt-rtp-isac Kevin P. Fleming
- Re: [payload] Interest in raft-ietf-avt-rtp-isac Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [payload] Interest in raft-ietf-avt-rtp-isac Kevin P. Fleming