Re: [payload] Interest in raft-ietf-avt-rtp-isac

[Harald Alvestrand <[e-mail]>]

I've queried within Google, and we're going to resurrect the draft.
It'll be a while still until we manage to get the information about 32 
kHz sample rate added, sorry.

                 Harald

On 03/01/2012 05:52 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> On 03/01/2012 05:12 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>> On 02/27/2012 09:09 PM, Ali C. Begen (abegen) wrote:
>>> WG,
>>>
>>> We have a milestone for this draft and we passed the target date some
>>> time ago. AFAICT, the current draft has expired and there was no
>>> continued work on this draft. I wonder whether the WG still has
>>> interest in finishing this work. Please reply to this email (cc'ing
>>> the payload list) if you have an interest/desire in seeing this
>>> document finished.
>>>
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avt-rtp-isac/
>> I have checked with the relevant ex-Gips team (now Google), and it seems
>> that we don't have any particular reason to make this a high priority at
>> the moment. It's stable code.
>>
>> Do other participants see a benefit in having this spec published as an
>> RFC?
>
> At the request of a community member, I've just started working on 
> adding support for iSAC passthrough in Asterisk, and while 
> investigating it I learned that Chrome can currently generate/accept 
> offers with iSAC at 32kHz sample rate, which is not included in this 
> draft.
>
> If Google is going to continue to distribute iSAC support in products 
> (and others are as well), I'd be happy to see this draft updated to 
> match the current state of deployments and get pushed towards 
> publication.
>