IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [payload] Interest in raft-ietf-avt-rtp-isac

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Thu, 01 March 2012 11:12 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C685521F8749 for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 03:12:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.508
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.508 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.091, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HuiYIcvdJIM8 for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 03:12:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77B921F8732 for <payload@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 03:12:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D073939E0D2 for <payload@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 12:12:56 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3IzxEH7pu19f for <payload@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 12:12:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from hta-dell.lul.corp.google.com (62-20-124-50.customer.telia.com [62.20.124.50]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBCB139E0A7 for <payload@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 12:12:55 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4F4F59B7.907@alvestrand.no>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 12:12:55 +0100
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.26) Gecko/20120131 Thunderbird/3.1.18
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: payload@ietf.org
References: <C15918F2FCDA0243A7C919DA7C4BE9940B549C@xmb-rcd-x01-p.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C15918F2FCDA0243A7C919DA7C4BE9940B549C@xmb-rcd-x01-p.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [payload] Interest in raft-ietf-avt-rtp-isac
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/payload>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 11:12:58 -0000

On 02/27/2012 09:09 PM, Ali C. Begen (abegen) wrote:
> WG,
>
> We have a milestone for this draft and we passed the target date some time ago. AFAICT, the current draft has expired and there was no continued work on this draft. I wonder whether the WG still has interest in finishing this work. Please reply to this email (cc'ing the payload list) if you have an interest/desire in seeing this document finished.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avt-rtp-isac/
I have checked with the relevant ex-Gips team (now Google), and it seems 
that we don't have any particular reason to make this a high priority at 
the moment. It's stable code.

Do other participants see a benefit in having this spec published as an RFC?
> Thanks.
> -acbegen
> _______________________________________________
> payload mailing list
> payload@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email