Re: [payload] WGLC for VP8 Payload
Tom Harper <tharper@logitech.com> Mon, 10 December 2012 20:39 UTC
Return-Path: <tharper@logitech.com>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA4F721F8654 for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:39:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6ISIMrU4CjpD for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:39:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na3sys009aog121.obsmtp.com (na3sys009aog121.obsmtp.com [74.125.149.145]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C4FA21F863A for <payload@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:39:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f198.google.com ([209.85.223.198]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob121.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUMZIkrrc9+Ti01rgZRLxLGTyN8UEWd4F@postini.com; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:39:47 PST
Received: by mail-ie0-f198.google.com with SMTP id c10so14526678ieb.1 for <payload@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:39:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=CXKwDiUY3G/yv2exW1kcVA3CkOtHk0VhsV+jyGJ9T4Y=; b=NUQzBI4i6pWxLuBTSIdYj4OwSKhbBH/13zv2PI/c7j8JU7cnRpblCszLNIyzjuxAZM He3dfJjsNWRp1dknclrq4HyUXVSwcNeId7i8JXu54KvLihV/GoSYBvFGGXJh8AZf/SVK NDm9ZDolvofNar5vwVpApGAfWNcfMUihSAEn6Z/+IirAcNfmoUMCBxnQiDU0quqbU+/w pIaXo83+9hfqGUV4G8mfCHYOsxBcJodVZ7J5VCcVZ5e2UchcEYWgyjEMEDezC44TsR78 Ycsx3D+Vu0nUZ215FTiDo12XzFB4+UncdFgaQErZtOh9T5FMi7nGUmarkUacoZgt8bJD 1ZIA==
Received: by 10.60.172.113 with SMTP id bb17mr8469724oec.110.1355171985222; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:39:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.172.113 with SMTP id bb17mr8469719oec.110.1355171985134; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:39:45 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.95.197 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:39:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <C15918F2FCDA0243A7C919DA7C4BE9940CD57F15@xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com>
References: <C15918F2FCDA0243A7C919DA7C4BE994FA5F87@xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com> <C15918F2FCDA0243A7C919DA7C4BE9940CD57F15@xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com>
From: Tom Harper <tharper@logitech.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:39:25 -0800
Message-ID: <CAFR7uqhpbbeHjSbnUT5ghYzDn+NsOxxvMKX6dBerePbV4tyt6Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec54d4028c892c104d0859039"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn4zvSSOXZWjAphSErFFif43UJ0PDdQsfC3YY3swbeW07QGJDpphclUKIskcV8TgPAmxqS6blz5umDC2AchYhlCRCzO3p0UsTsF8kOYTQS0rdZ6pJz2YgA45xQ7Sq2EfeBOgSj5i4Z4GzS5QwVNhNUPWD7Nvg==
Cc: "payload@ietf.org" <payload@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [payload] WGLC for VP8 Payload
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/payload>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:39:47 -0000
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Ali C. Begen (abegen) <abegen@cisco.com>wrote: > I have not seen any comments on the list. There were some issues raised in > the previous call. I am assuming all parties are happy with the current > version. > > I will prepare the document write-up. > Hi, I have no further feedback at this time- it seems that all of the concerns from before have been addressed, and we are working with the current draft version. Thanks! Tom
- [payload] WGLC for VP8 Payload Ali C. Begen (abegen)
- Re: [payload] WGLC for VP8 Payload Ali C. Begen (abegen)
- Re: [payload] WGLC for VP8 Payload Ali C. Begen (abegen)
- Re: [payload] WGLC for VP8 Payload Tom Harper
- Re: [payload] WGLC for VP8 Payload Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [payload] WGLC for VP8 Payload Jonathan Lennox
- Re: [payload] WGLC for VP8 Payload Ali C. Begen (abegen)
- Re: [payload] WGLC for VP8 Payload Jonathan Lennox
- Re: [payload] WGLC for VP8 Payload Ali C. Begen (abegen)
- Re: [payload] WGLC for VP8 Payload Patrik Westin
- Re: [payload] WGLC for VP8 Payload Patrik Westin
- Re: [payload] WGLC for VP8 Payload Ali C. Begen (abegen)
- Re: [payload] WGLC for VP8 Payload Patrik Westin
- Re: [payload] WGLC for VP8 Payload Jonathan Lennox
- Re: [payload] WGLC for VP8 Payload Patrik Westin
- Re: [payload] WGLC for VP8 Payload Ali C. Begen (abegen)
- Re: [payload] WGLC for VP8 Payload Stephan Wenger
- Re: [payload] WGLC for VP8 Payload Glen Zorn
- Re: [payload] WGLC for VP8 Payload Patrik Westin
- Re: [payload] WGLC for VP8 Payload Ali C. Begen (abegen)
- Re: [payload] WGLC for VP8 Payload Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [payload] WGLC for VP8 Payload Ali C. Begen (abegen)
- Re: [payload] WGLC for VP8 Payload Roni Even
- Re: [payload] WGLC for VP8 Payload Jonathan Lennox