IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [payload] New version of draft-ietf-payload-vp8

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Tue, 22 September 2015 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68CCB1A9140 for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:51:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EDBJauGjBXjB for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:51:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76DB31A9110 for <payload@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:51:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.20.10.2] (mobile-166-173-187-116.mycingular.net [166.173.187.116]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t8MHpdFb084984 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:51:45 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host mobile-166-173-187-116.mycingular.net [166.173.187.116] claimed to be [172.20.10.2]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:51:34 -0500
Message-ID: <ABF82691-9D71-4BB6-9285-06160D498C1F@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <C760EE04-FB6D-4B9C-A555-F7BC1DA4DB17@nostrum.com>
References: <CAOhzyf=qB9MNQO6=AjC8OArrxcC8zDwsOa_RdF2aV-3jwmHLCw@mail.gmail.com> <05DD07CB-26A5-4D07-9605-86C7D321B093@nostrum.com> <658F1EF8-8933-43E7-ADDF-173904FE60A2@csperkins.org> <55F1AEC9.6050408@alvestrand.no> <4D9392D8-4790-41EB-9FC6-B7CC98895E10@nostrum.com> <560190B1.3040400@alvestrand.no> <C760EE04-FB6D-4B9C-A555-F7BC1DA4DB17@nostrum.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.2r5107)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/payload/MTc67Wv180qPapQIkbXe-aqf5sg>
Cc: payload@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [payload] New version of draft-ietf-payload-vp8
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/payload/>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:51:49 -0000

On 22 Sep 2015, at 12:43, Ben Campbell wrote:

> Has there been closure on Elwyn's Gen-ART telechat review and on
>>> Colin's comments on the payload list? I was under the impression 
>>> that
>>> at least Colin's comments might result in an update (although we can
>>> handle minor changes with RFC editor notes)
>
>
>
> I didn't see a response to the above. IIUC, these are distinct from 
> Colin's and Elwyn's other points that I had copied below.

On re-reading the list, I think I was mistaken about the comments being 
distinct--never mind about this part.

Thanks!

Ben.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email