[payload] New version of draft-ietf-payload-vp8

Henrik Lundin <hlundin@google.com> Wed, 09 September 2015 21:02 UTC

Return-Path: <hlundin@google.com>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F5471ACDEA for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 14:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.407
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.407 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.981, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bmAo1yWqFDzY for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 14:02:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x22e.google.com (mail-io0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C83941B2AA0 for <payload@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 14:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iofh134 with SMTP id h134so37734359iof.0 for <payload@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 14:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=IIrwQ6rxl5KmYBspB6WR+W+cSSng1Q1XbCNs/IgTm2c=; b=ejXn7W4tJKgCID94Wv5Z91wQQljcpZ1XSEdpRIyftKjM2wQR/dgJbB0MDoMPYQznLf S5Kb2kWuzE1HJ69ONzqsNRi/hYS2hcydDmod2z0bkZ09JtAiUrpRQeFbfb01X/MI/0mp epVkjbDUuYw+6SY54z2fhstaQ/hGMfimOmIicYRbZOa3ztwhexeFm9REPveHioB/pMJN O/wQjHeNayfh7W0gpGzwM2+XJ62JtcZpcRMBawXQFBC3/8wWBWajwDwYiVE6MIRgI2Vz 9yM6kqeNVkEb3HtBth8Cm/zK7JMSrjhTpKnxNkOwWJ9Neds2HYq2S6+Kzb7RWuNQKJI6 mfZA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=IIrwQ6rxl5KmYBspB6WR+W+cSSng1Q1XbCNs/IgTm2c=; b=W4KgmyoAtM0DwQD6YBIkq64pRTLmdll5hZnGp97NjBv3ctxVwOv/jQf9XlXFH54fX1 kyHAOZwohGPXI7MglRLmmEDY9B1/VerzgJy3qN5U6H4+9OQAoejghpun2Tmo+1UE1GTB EWKGSANg1zYKQicAABD1uC4M7FvIwk5QF03hksdZO+Te2nAeejyXrStiiSCQEA3WtgVu MQCgKw2+Fi5VeHS0xTM3PDNCVbwHyBAI/jiT1o52ZJ5raGIS5gQxxt+1ykPADhyAg260 iKRJyCtXne9yadAY+bqnK6tExq/Qq1jaKHnchOta40cHrXhuxAnSFhajHkIXIgwA/qqa 8JuA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmTTd9GSfmYXRo13G6fSwrvVNK5KYlk9H/sa/yzbJgiTY27NaXN92h82X69qvHO2Nm35AOo
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.160.143 with SMTP id j137mr30004818ioe.13.1441832520084; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 14:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.162.165 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 14:01:59 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 23:01:59 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOhzyf=qB9MNQO6=AjC8OArrxcC8zDwsOa_RdF2aV-3jwmHLCw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Henrik Lundin <hlundin@google.com>
To: "payload@ietf.org" <payload@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-payload-vp8@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-payload-vp8@tools.ietf.org>, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114043d62fb423051f56cb31"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/payload/NeuOg4HeUxtJf2GVjF4JEkNrx6Y>
Subject: [payload] New version of draft-ietf-payload-vp8
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/payload/>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 21:02:02 -0000

Payload WG:

After the second Last Call, we have done a review of the document against
the comments that were pointed out to us on this document and on previous
versions of the document.

We have made no technical changes to the document, but have added a number
of grammar updates and clarifications. Some of the important clarifications
are as follows:

We have added a number of definitions that were previously only in
referenced documents.

With regard to indexes that start at random numbers and wrap, we’ve
switched to consistently using “wrap”. The text about not starting at zero
is just to say that starting at zero is not required; there is no security
benefit that we know of.

We have removed some material that was repeated from RFC 6386; it was clear
that the explanation copied up was not sufficient for understanding, and we
found it better to refer to the more complete specification in RFC 6386 for
that material.

The definition of the Y-bit and structure of temporal layers has been
strengthened.

SLI and RPSI have been explained with more links back to RFC 4585.

We note that the text about pathological data noted in the sec-dir review
comes from the RTP HOWTO - we have updated the copied text to be consistent
with version -14 of the RTP HOWTO draft.

The Gen-ART review suggested to add a definition of temporal base layer. We
added an informal reference to an article on scalable video coding, and
think that the general definitions of scalability found therein apply to
this draft too.

The Gen-ART review also suggested that the VER field in the VP8 Payload
Header should be validated by the depacketizer. We disagree with this, and
argue that the VER field should be verified by the VP8 decoder.

For minor updates, please refer to the diff at
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-payload-vp8-17.

With this update, we believe the document is ready for publication.

Sincerely,
/Henrik

-- 
Henrik Lundin | WebRTC Software Eng | hlundin@google.com | +46 70 646 13 41