Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20

Boris Khasanov <> Tue, 30 May 2023 08:04 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6537C15106F; Tue, 30 May 2023 01:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.619
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG=0.377, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yZvpBXY1Fwkm; Tue, 30 May 2023 01:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c03:500:1:45:d181:df01]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05C0EC14CE2F; Tue, 30 May 2023 01:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c0c:2f89:0:640:3a8b:0]) by (Yandex) with ESMTP id 64CE36078D; Tue, 30 May 2023 11:04:44 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from (2a02:6b8:c0c:908e:0:640:f9c2:0 [2a02:6b8:c0c:908e:0:640:f9c2:0]) by (mxbackcorp/Yandex) with HTTP id X4HRpk0OxW20-Agqbm6fO; Tue, 30 May 2023 11:04:44 +0300
X-Yandex-Fwd: 2
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=default; t=1685433884; bh=xLDeehZQ6Y975LJhRy+3mcxVpagKVQNoHiqZ1efddoE=; h=References:Date:Message-Id:Cc:Subject:To:From:In-Reply-To; b=DO7ILABWhrksaKAtUUC9KqAbtMHiXwssVQmFxrCX7c37Hm1918j28AdRHRw9ty1Zl Ma3Bxw77THrnX97lODFqIjs3S/88OWkFsuxX1SGnqAd5rh9TIKm1RkRbO9VBdtGF/d pNn+qaxxr67ghQVKTvptPvYG2+CKFJCsKA9pYEbs=
Authentication-Results:; dkim=pass
Received: from ( [2a02:6b8:c12:5ba5:0:640:44fd:0]) by (mxbackcorp/Yandex) with HTTP id K4H1fM0Ova60-5n98fIlI for <>; Tue, 30 May 2023 11:04:34 +0300
Received: by with HTTP; Tue, 30 May 2023 11:04:33 +0300
From: Boris Khasanov <>
To: Dhruv Dhody <>, "" <>
Cc: pce-chairs <>, "" <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Yamail [ ] 5.0
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 11:04:43 +0300
Message-Id: <>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 08:04:54 -0000

Hi Dhruv and all,
I read the last -21 version and support the publication of this draft as co-author.
It describes another option for practical implementation of PCECC architecture in Native IP networks. Obviously a lot of work ahead but  we need a basement: PCEP extensions and procedures to get it done.
17.05.2023, 01:16, "Dhruv Dhody" <>:
Hi WG,

This email starts a 2-weeks working group last call for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20 [1].  

Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you support it, please indicate that you have read the latest version and it is ready for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and nits are most welcome.

The WG LC will end on Wednesday 31st May 2023. We will also notify the IDR WG about this WGLC.

A general reminder to the WG to be more vocal during the last-call/adoption and help us unclog our queues :)  

Dhruv & Julien

[1]" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">

Pce mailing list" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">