Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20 Wed, 31 May 2023 03:15 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D6B6C151B19; Tue, 30 May 2023 20:15:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.896
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3UzGiYzb-uUi; Tue, 30 May 2023 20:15:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DD2BC151B17; Tue, 30 May 2023 20:15:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4QWDt55s1Dz5B150; Wed, 31 May 2023 11:15:41 +0800 (CST)
Received: from (unknown []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4QWDsW1p32z501R0; Wed, 31 May 2023 11:15:11 +0800 (CST)
Received: from ([]) by with SMTP id 34V3F13r032625; Wed, 31 May 2023 11:15:01 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from
Received: from mapi (njy2app04[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Wed, 31 May 2023 11:15:02 +0800 (CST)
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 11:15:02 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afc6476bbb6ffffffff8fa-512be
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-MAIL: 34V3F13r032625
X-Fangmail-Gw-Spam-Type: 0
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 6476BBDD.000/4QWDt55s1Dz5B150
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 03:15:50 -0000

Dear Chairs and WG,

I have read the new version and I support the WGLC.
Some editorial suggestions are as following shown.
In section 5.1, "Where:  <cci-list> is as per   [I-D.ietf-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller]." It may update to RFC9050.
In section 5.1, "Further only one  and one kind of BPI, EPR, or PPA object MUST be present." It is a little confused. Maybe that can be changed to "One BPI, EPR, or PPA object MUST be present and others should be ignored."

Best Regards,

<<[Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20
<<Dhruv Dhody <> Tue, 16 May 2023 22:16 UTCShow header
Hi WG, This email starts a 2-weeks working group last call for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20 [1]. Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you support it, please indicate that you have read the latest version and it is ready for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and nits are most welcome. The WG LC will end on Wednesday 31st May 2023. We will also notify the IDR WG about this WGLC. A general reminder to the WG to be more vocal during the last-call/adoption and help us unclog our queues :) Thanks, Dhruv & Julien [1]