[Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association
"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sun, 14 July 2019 13:00 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC4131201E5; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 06:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iaXU1CKHbGMF; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 06:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta5.iomartmail.com (mta5.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B85AB1201D8; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 06:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (vs1.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.121]) by mta5.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x6ED0Qel000606; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 14:00:26 +0100
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD1D2203B; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 14:00:26 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224]) by vs1.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58C1B2203A; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 14:00:26 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([87.112.43.83]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x6ED0MAb021217 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 14 Jul 2019 14:00:25 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 14:00:23 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <002b01d53a44$1b49dbb0$51dd9310$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdU6Q4xvTJ99DzIaRmKYTD/3pZYP7A==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 87.112.43.83
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-24758.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--6.372-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--6.372-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-24758.007
X-TMASE-Result: 10--6.371700-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: Ay/deDYN6tVlJLKspAhkh7IGMNfiwa5Nqb3/o5s+OcNVxfQMC1c5+Wb6 PphVtfZgEd46bnfzirm9l4v67wxPuiRWbQiOCWEdnMQdNQ64xfepXdWa4gU0S0E3/qvOjgFLClV gb+Q30otZ7v1X6O/KvMm9gIibQqT6w5B5ycCESltLIfps09VJ26Gnvnr+szpSBCzD0Dc8iUuSN5 t8Lx0BlhP8Ntjl+GIDffLk5O83BXt7sA2bn/fOxp4CIKY/Hg3AtOt1ofVlaoJ1wPk/GHGZA7RMD KJfrGJCDV8DVAd6AO/dB/CxWTRRu4as+d5/8j56oNT8fqG3Z28gED3McacEDUuJe6snDr68tY/2 Dcvo1aefPxyRyYpT4Q==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/0nRU9-W3u--scJswah8ba0IPZmI>
Subject: [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 13:00:31 -0000
Hi WG, He authors of draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association have been asking for adoption and... - the base PCEP association extensions seem to be stable and advancing - I did an early review and the authors span a new version So, this starts an adoption poll for the draft. Because IETF-105 is imminent and you all have lots to do and read, we'll make this a three week poll ending on 4th August. Please send your comments of support or antipathy. In either case, please indicate whether or not you have read the draft, and if you support it, please say whether or not you propose to and even possibly implement the draft. Many thanks, Adrian (for the chairs)
- [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody-pce… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody… Jeff Tantsura
- [Pce] 答复: PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody… Zhenghaomian (Zhenghaomian, Optical Technology Research Dept)
- Re: [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody… Young Lee
- Re: [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody… Satish K
- Re: [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody… Mahendra Singh Negi
- Re: [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody… 윤빈영
- Re: [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody… 박춘걸 (Biz Total Solution Projec)
- Re: [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody… Zhangxian (Xian)
- Re: [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- [Pce] 答复: PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody… Aijun Wang