IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association

"Chengli (Cheng Li)" <chengli13@huawei.com> Thu, 15 August 2019 02:43 UTC

Return-Path: <chengli13@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A9DB120816; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 19:43:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ThvIB4v_cMVG; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 19:43:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20BEE120122; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 19:43:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id E828AC7CA20B87DFC993; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 03:43:04 +0100 (IST)
Received: from DGGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.32) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 03:43:04 +0100
Received: from DGGEML529-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.253]) by DGGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com ([fe80::89ed:853e:30a9:2a79%31]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 10:38:40 +0800
From: "Chengli (Cheng Li)" <chengli13@huawei.com>
To: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association@ietf.org" <draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association
Thread-Index: AdU6Q4xvTJ99DzIaRmKYTD/3pZYP7AYMWnoAACcgJAA=
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 02:38:39 +0000
Message-ID: <C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB02668928@dggeml529-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <002b01d53a44$1b49dbb0$51dd9310$@olddog.co.uk> <005101d552b8$1dc111b0$59433510$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <005101d552b8$1dc111b0$59433510$@olddog.co.uk>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.130.185.75]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/_wmC1g-y4stSvZfy2H43Y6zSUp8>
Subject: Re: [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 02:43:09 -0000

Support. The draft will help on virtual network in PCE architecture, and the text is mature with implementation status as well.

I am thinking that I should read more drafts of PCE association, so many good ideas! 

Thanks to the authors and contributors, the stepping down chair as well.     :)

Best Regards,
Cheng




-----Original Message-----
From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2019 11:51 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association

Hi PCE WG,

The adoption poll for this draft was not overwhelming. Possibly this was because of the overlap with IETF-105 when you were all busy.

Thanks to everyone who did respond to the poll. If there are any more of you out there who think the WG should adopt this work please speak up.
Especially happy to hear form those who have read the draft, and those who plan to help with reviews and implementations.

Thanks,
Adrian (still trying to step down!)

-----Original Message-----
From: Pce <pce-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
Sent: 14 July 2019 14:00
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association

Hi WG,

He authors of draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association have been asking for adoption and...

- the base PCEP association extensions seem to be stable and advancing
- I did an early review and the authors span a new version

So, this starts an adoption poll for the draft. Because IETF-105 is imminent and you all have lots to do and read, we'll make this a three week poll ending on 4th August.

Please send your comments of support or antipathy.

In either case, please indicate whether or not you have read the draft, and if you support it, please say whether or not you propose to and even possibly implement the draft.

Many thanks,
Adrian (for the chairs)

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email