IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 14 August 2019 15:51 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1958C120130; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 08:51:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v_tzegrfhF0t; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 08:51:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F3861200C1; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 08:51:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (vs3.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.124]) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x7EFpN2K030269; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 16:51:23 +0100
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002822203A; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 16:51:23 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224]) by vs3.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF67422032; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 16:51:22 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (120.105.162.213.dyn.plus.net [213.162.105.120] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x7EFocil020395 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 14 Aug 2019 16:51:13 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association@ietf.org
References: <002b01d53a44$1b49dbb0$51dd9310$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <002b01d53a44$1b49dbb0$51dd9310$@olddog.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 16:50:38 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <005101d552b8$1dc111b0$59433510$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQGvSqPBO30605KRpHk4GY0PJb3Gv6dG1aiQ
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 213.162.105.120
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-24848.000
X-TM-AS-Result: No--11.956-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--11.956-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-24848.000
X-TMASE-Result: 10--11.956000-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: fE0JoqABJp3xIbpQ8BhdbLKe1KMOtvrh8QCUCx466G9XAXIeUMyR09xw X69jh9hhns9y7ZgvN6OhqJ45KPIF+7KRmD27FFbqUPktDdOX0fs6En2bnefhoGquw69QUQrLjAW n+cwj67YpBuTwKkPZjvZPjKzb6G9Xsh5ZvpwMTmSVUcz8XpiS9Ev3HgUK4EtR/gmHPoZ9Iu1m+j 6YVbX2YBHeOm5384q5vZeL+u8MT7okVm0IjglhHZzEHTUOuMX3qV3VmuIFNEtBN/6rzo4BS4mDm K9MSvN+zKO6rfLW2lpqnSH8sNhHpEyO27FZOPGvzNIobH2DzGEqaLKskc2Hcl70lsqJNmceH+mg UoY3FGCBuU0JjDySQaW6Ctebkgpww06jXpUJ/XLH9K2ZqHQWln0tCKdnhB58vqq8s2MNhPAL4Kb F8qbADAzKt8/2P4LV33fj+sMArfOEbaqKQSlAZQCy6IJw5HAsSfQweS9tq5v4pczG9Q3AZkHZJO lN1tIjU1ny4EWmj7Y=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/KA4BsHWld-l1_9A8WK-u9mmi3Vs>
Subject: Re: [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 15:51:28 -0000

Hi PCE WG,

The adoption poll for this draft was not overwhelming. Possibly this was
because of the overlap with IETF-105 when you were all busy.

Thanks to everyone who did respond to the poll. If there are any more of you
out there who think the WG should adopt this work please speak up.
Especially happy to hear form those who have read the draft, and those who
plan to help with reviews and implementations.

Thanks,
Adrian (still trying to step down!)

-----Original Message-----
From: Pce <pce-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
Sent: 14 July 2019 14:00
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association

Hi WG,

He authors of draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association have been asking for
adoption and...

- the base PCEP association extensions seem to be stable and advancing
- I did an early review and the authors span a new version

So, this starts an adoption poll for the draft. Because IETF-105 is imminent
and you all have lots to do and read, we'll make this a three week poll
ending on 4th August.

Please send your comments of support or antipathy.

In either case, please indicate whether or not you have read the draft, and
if you support it, please say whether or not you propose to and even
possibly implement the draft.

Many thanks,
Adrian (for the chairs)

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email