[Pce] 答复: PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association

["Aijun Wang" <[e-mail]>]

Hi, All:

 

Support for the adoption.

 

One suggestion is the following:

 

As described in section 3.2
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-association-group-10#section-3.2
>  of [draft ietf-pce-association-group]:

“PCEP extensions that define a new association type should clarify the
relationship between the SVEC object and the association type, if any.”
 
As the VN creation request if from the customer, can the
“Requestion-ID-number” be used to association these PCE initiated
associated LSPs? Add some text to clarify this may be more helpful.
 

 

Best Regards.

 

Aijun Wang

China Telecom

 

 

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] 代表 Adrian
Farrel
发送时间: 2019年8月14日 23:51
收件人: [e-mail]
抄送: [e-mail]
主题: Re: [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association

 

Hi PCE WG,

 

The adoption poll for this draft was not overwhelming. Possibly this was
because of the overlap with IETF-105 when you were all busy.

 

Thanks to everyone who did respond to the poll. If there are any more of you
out there who think the WG should adopt this work please speak up.

Especially happy to hear form those who have read the draft, and those who
plan to help with reviews and implementations.

 

Thanks,

Adrian (still trying to step down!)

 

-----Original Message-----

From: Pce < <mailto:[e-mail]> [e-mail]> On Behalf Of
Adrian Farrel

Sent: 14 July 2019 14:00

To:  <mailto:[e-mail]> [e-mail]

Cc:  <mailto:[e-mail]>
[e-mail]

Subject: [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association

 

Hi WG,

 

He authors of draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association have been asking for
adoption and...

 

- the base PCEP association extensions seem to be stable and advancing

- I did an early review and the authors span a new version

 

So, this starts an adoption poll for the draft. Because IETF-105 is imminent
and you all have lots to do and read, we'll make this a three week poll
ending on 4th August.

 

Please send your comments of support or antipathy.

 

In either case, please indicate whether or not you have read the draft, and
if you support it, please say whether or not you propose to and even
possibly implement the draft.

 

Many thanks,

Adrian (for the chairs)

 

_______________________________________________

Pce mailing list

 <mailto:[e-mail]> [e-mail]

 <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

 

_______________________________________________

Pce mailing list

 <mailto:[e-mail]> [e-mail]

 <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce