IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Update on draft-ietf-pce-policy-enabled-path-comp

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Fri, 12 October 2007 21:36 UTC

Return-path: <pce-bounces@lists.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IgSB5-0004nw-NK; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:36:15 -0400
Received: from pce by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IgSB3-0004mJ-2c for pce-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:36:13 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IgSB2-0004lY-Oq for pce@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:36:12 -0400
Received: from esc91.midphase.com ([216.104.33.66]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IgSAx-0005nM-IJ for pce@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:36:12 -0400
Received: from esc91.midphase.com ([216.104.33.66] helo=LC1.labn.net) by esc91.midphase.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1IgSAd-0007tu-V4; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:35:48 -0400
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:34:18 -0400
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Update on draft-ietf-pce-policy-enabled-path-comp
In-Reply-To: <0c1001c80bff$99ff71c0$5102010a@your029b8cecfe>
References: <2166BDE3-E20D-4E45-B46D-CB8FB025C5FC@cisco.com> <14FE4A67-E8D3-4FE7-A686-CECA7BD519A4@cisco.com> <8AA97249241F7148BE6D3D8B93D83F5A0F5FB42B@ftrdmel2> <0c1001c80bff$99ff71c0$5102010a@your029b8cecfe>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - esc91.midphase.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7d33c50f3756db14428398e2bdedd581
Message-Id: <E1IgSB3-0004mJ-2c@megatron.ietf.org>
Cc: gash5107@yahoo.com, Igor Bryskin <IBryskin@advaoptical.com>, Thomas Walsh <twalsh@juniper.net>, pce@ietf.org, JACQUENET Christian RD-DDEV-REN <christian.jacquenet@orange-ftgroup.com>
X-BeenThere: pce@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: pce-bounces@lists.ietf.org

At 08:09 AM 10/11/2007, Adrian Farrel wrote:
>[...]
>Authors, can you tell me whether the scope of comments here are 
>large enough to justify a new revision before working group last 
>call? It seems to me that the answer should probably be "yes", but 
>I'm open to persuasion.
>[...]

Adrian,
         Speaking only for myself and not my co-authors, I don't 
believe addressing the comments will result in any substantive 
changes.  That said, the resulting document should be more 
readable.  If we wait for the last call, we can probably have a rev 
out in the first week of November.

I have slight preference for doing a last call now so we can find out 
if there are any more substantive issues that need to be 
addressed.  But, it's your call if you want to wait.

Lou



_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email