RE: [Pce] Update on draft-ietf-pce-policy-enabled-path-comp

"PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri" <Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel-lucent.be> Tue, 18 September 2007 22:13 UTC

Return-path: <pce-bounces@lists.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IXlJW-0005gU-UG; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 18:13:03 -0400
Received: from pce by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IXlJV-0005gF-8O for pce-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 18:13:01 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IXlJU-0005g7-TQ for pce@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 18:13:00 -0400
Received: from colt-na7.alcatel.fr ([62.23.212.7] helo=smail6.alcatel.fr) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IXlJU-0001XV-7a for pce@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 18:13:00 -0400
Received: from FRVELSBHS02.ad2.ad.alcatel.com (frvelsbhs02.ad2.ad.alcatel.com [155.132.6.74]) by smail6.alcatel.fr (8.13.4/8.13.4/ICT) with ESMTP id l8IMCJQt020260; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:12:19 +0200
Received: from FRVELSMBS22.ad2.ad.alcatel.com ([155.132.6.56]) by FRVELSBHS02.ad2.ad.alcatel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2499); Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:12:57 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Pce] Update on draft-ietf-pce-policy-enabled-path-comp
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:12:35 +0200
Message-ID: <8144761F31F48D43AD53D09F5350E38001510685@FRVELSMBS22.ad2.ad.alcatel.com>
In-Reply-To: <EFED7C9A-25C6-48B9-AC41-2B778A138B61@cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Update on draft-ietf-pce-policy-enabled-path-comp
thread-index: Acf6QJ03n1ylkJdQR5Gsev4zLDxJfAAAEZKw
References: <2166BDE3-E20D-4E45-B46D-CB8FB025C5FC@cisco.com> <8144761F31F48D43AD53D09F5350E38001510648@FRVELSMBS22.ad2.ad.alcatel.com> <EFED7C9A-25C6-48B9-AC41-2B778A138B61@cisco.com>
From: PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri <Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel-lucent.be>
To: JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Sep 2007 22:12:57.0265 (UTC) FILETIME=[11412A10:01C7FA41]
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 155.132.188.84
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 10ba05e7e8a9aa6adb025f426bef3a30
Cc: JACQUENET Christian RD-TCH-REN <christian.jacquenet@francetelecom.com>, gash5107@yahoo.com, Thomas Walsh <twalsh@juniper.net>, pce@ietf.org, Igor Bryskin <ibryskin@movaz.com>
X-BeenThere: pce@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: pce-bounces@lists.ietf.org

hi j-p

just wanted to know why only this document. i do not have 
any specific objection in accommodating comments from the
IP Sphere in case they are valuable of course.

-d. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: JP Vasseur [mailto:jvasseur@cisco.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 12:08 AM
> To: PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri
> Cc: pce@ietf.org; Lou Berger; Igor Bryskin; Dimitri 
> Papadimitriou; gash5107@yahoo.com; Adrian Farrel; Thomas 
> Walsh; JACQUENET Christian RD-TCH-REN
> Subject: Re: [Pce] Update on draft-ietf-pce-policy-enabled-path-comp
> 
> Hi Dimitri,
> 
> On Sep 18, 2007, at 4:04 PM, PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri wrote:
> 
> > j-p
> >
> > simple question: why only the policy doc. ?
> >
> > why are the other documents not liaised to IP Sphere ? or 
> you would  
> > like
> > to reserve a specific treatment to the policy document (the 
> enabler of
> > the whole stuff at the inter-domain level) ?
> >
> 
> As discussed during the last PCE IETF meeting and as reported in the  
> minutes,
> the idea was simply to see whether IPSphere might have comments/feed- 
> backs
> to provide. There is no "specific treatment", the idea of 
> seeking for  
> comments from
> IPSphere on this document is motivated by the fact that they are  
> actively working
> on policy. This is not a formal liaison, just a proposal for comments.
> Note that the goal is to not delay the progress of document by all  
> means (thus the
> dead-line for comments (mid-October).
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> JP.
> 
> > -d.
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: JP Vasseur [mailto:jvasseur@cisco.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 8:10 PM
> >> To: pce@ietf.org; Lou Berger; Igor Bryskin; Dimitri
> >> Papadimitriou; gash5107@yahoo.com
> >> Cc: Thomas Walsh; JACQUENET Christian RD-TCH-REN
> >> Subject: [Pce] Update on draft-ietf-pce-policy-enabled-path-comp
> >>
> >> Dear WG,
> >>
> >> From the WG minutes of the IETF-69 meeting:
> >>
> >>
> >> 12) Update on Policy-Enabled Path Computation Framework
> >> draft-ietf-pce-policy-enabled-path-comp-01.txt (Lou - 5mn) [110]
> >>
> >>
> >> Lou> ready for Last Call
> >> JP> It sounds ready. Suggestion: offer IPSphere to have a
> >> look at the doc before last call. JP will be the point
> >> of contact. Asked Ross whether this is a good idea, and Ross
> >> agreed. Once comments are received, last call.
> >> Adrian> OK, but this is not an indefinite consultation. We
> >> want to be able to move ahead and complete the I-D
> >> relatively soon.
> >>
> >> We have contacted IPSphere and RA WG of IPSphere should
> >> provide us some feed-back by
> >> mid-October. I have copied Tom Walsh and Christian Jacquenet
> >> (chair of the RAWG) IPSphere.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> JP.
> >>
> 


_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce