Re: [Pce] Considering draft-vasseur-pce-monitoring-03.txt for WG status

I also support it.

Cheers,
Jau.

On Jul 3, 2007, at 3:53 PM, A S Kiran Koushik wrote:

> Hi,
> This draft has useful information required to monitor and troubleshoot
> PCEs and in conjunction with the PCE MIBs will provide an excellent  
> PCE management framework.
>
> I support that this be made a WG document.
>
> Regards,
> Kiran. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adrian Farrel"  
> <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
> To: <pce@ietf.org>
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 6:09 PM
> Subject: [Pce] Considering draft-vasseur-pce-monitoring-03.txt for  
> WG status
>
>
>> Hi,
>> draft-vasseur-pce-monitoring-03.txt was updated last month to take  
>> into account issues raised in Prague and on the mailing list.
>> The I-D specifies procedures and extensions to PCEP in order to  
>> gather information about the state of the chain of PCEs involved  
>> in a path computation chain for troubleshooting and performance  
>> monitoring purposes.
>> Please state your opinion on whether this should become a working  
>> group draft.
>> Thanks,
>> Adrian _______________________________________________
>> Pce mailing list
>> Pce@lists.ietf.org
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce