[Pce] Re: PCE MIB drafts

"A S Kiran Koushik" <kkoushik@cisco.com> Wed, 11 July 2007 21:10 UTC

Return-path: <pce-bounces@lists.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I8jSP-0002CB-Ov; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:10:45 -0400
Received: from pce by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1I8jSO-0002C1-02 for pce-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:10:44 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I8jSN-0002Bt-LR for pce@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:10:43 -0400
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.102.122.148]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I8jSN-0000kz-DK for pce@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:10:43 -0400
Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Jul 2007 17:10:35 -0400
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAI7jlEZAZnmf/2dsb2JhbAA
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.16,528,1175486400"; d="scan'208"; a="64941417:sNHT71876282"
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-core-1.cisco.com [64.102.124.12]) by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l6BLAYif004999; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:10:34 -0400
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l6BLA86w009955; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:10:30 GMT
Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:10:12 -0400
Received: from kkoushikwxp ([64.101.185.226]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:10:12 -0400
Message-ID: <031401c7c3ff$e2234eb0$e2b96540@apac.cisco.com>
From: A S Kiran Koushik <kkoushik@cisco.com>
To: Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@polymtl.ca>, pce@ietf.org
References: <022d01c7b9d9$97dbba70$0a23fea9@your029b8cecfe> <1184026777.4692d099688b7@www.imp.polymtl.ca> <7712E4B3-969E-46CD-A176-4CF8FE36266B@cisco.com> <1184112261.46941e851d4d5@www.imp.polymtl.ca> <831B0E5C-9E39-44A3-812C-76273FE8F50D@cisco.com> <1184172953.46950b99e28ab@www.imp.polymtl.ca>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:10:17 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="utf-8"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jul 2007 21:10:12.0181 (UTC) FILETIME=[DE963050:01C7C3FF]
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1744; t=1184188235; x=1185052235; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=kkoushik@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22A=20S=20Kiran=20Koushik=22=20<kkoushik@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20PCE=20MIB=20drafts |Sender:=20 |To:=20=22Meral=20Shirazipour=22=20<meral.shirazipour@polymtl.ca>, =20<pce @ietf.org>; bh=X11sMkbmH5GsLy/ARF0Yu5FrfbNggMTakxgo8vhAIPE=; b=phoLeNPj7UDcjIwcH5AfbKFNIAtG7BHoKQg3vxYXZ6vvOzWOlZ0do6XcGsuCaF+e9xfeRDEo jGbq59csiEMpUZXecuJvy3wIWqqpiM+uN8elLcali3Clma5JfGGkARnh;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=kkoushik@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim2001 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 538aad3a3c4f01d8b6a6477ca4248793
Cc:
Subject: [Pce] Re: PCE MIB drafts
X-BeenThere: pce@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: pce-bounces@lists.ietf.org

Hi Meral,
The SNMP management interface for PCEs is still
work in progress and whenever a need arises we are open to add new
MIBs as appropriate.

As of now we have not started working on draft-ietf-pce-pcc-mib.

Let us discuss if you have anything specific in mind.

Regards,
Kiran.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Meral Shirazipour" <meral.shirazipour@polymtl.ca>
To: <pce@ietf.org>
Cc: "JP Vasseur" <jvasseur@cisco.com>; <kkoushik@cisco.com>; "LE ROUX Jean-Louis 
RD-CORE-LAN" <jeanlouis.leroux@orange-ftgroup.com>; "Yuichi Ikejiri" 
<y.ikejiri@ntt.com>; "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 11:55 AM
Subject: PCE MIB drafts


> Dear PCEers,
>   This one is for anyone involved with the MIBs drafts. I do not remember the
> early discussions about the MIBs, but from the threads below and what Kiran
> confirmed recently,
> http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce/current/msg00987.html
> http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce/current/msg01265.html
>
> is it right to assume that the WG has only identified 4 MIB drafts to be
> defined:?
> MIB module               WG draft name
> ================================================
> PCE-DISC-DRAFT-MIB         draft-ietf-pce-disc-mib
> -- PCE discovery MIB.
>
> PCE-PCEP-DRAFT-MIB         draft-ietf-pce-pcep-mib
> -- PCE communication protocol MIB
>
> PCE-PCC-DRAFT-MIB          draft-ietf-pce-pcc-mib
> -- Path Computation Client MIB
>
> PCE-TC-DRAFT-MIB           draft-ietf-pce-tc-mib
> -- PCE Textual conventions MIB.
>
>
>
> Has anyone started working on draft-ietf-pce-pcc-mib?
>
> Also, is there still room to add additional MIB modules to this list?
>
> Thanks &
> Best Regards,
> Meral 


_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce