Re: [Pce] Considering draft-vasseur-pce-monitoring-03.txt for WG status

"A S Kiran Koushik" <kkoushik@cisco.com> Tue, 03 July 2007 19:54 UTC

Return-path: <pce-bounces@lists.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I5oRx-0007uM-3s; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 15:54:13 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I5oRv-0007qn-Fw for pce@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 15:54:11 -0400
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I5oRr-0002Cs-0i for pce@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 15:54:11 -0400
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Jul 2007 12:54:06 -0700
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAHZGikarR7PEh2dsb2JhbACPJAIJDiw
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.16,494,1175497200"; d="scan'208"; a="165468232:sNHT63937755"
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l63Js6Y4000386; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 12:54:06 -0700
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l63Js4XL018891; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 19:54:05 GMT
Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 3 Jul 2007 15:53:38 -0400
Received: from kkoushikwxp ([64.101.185.227]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 3 Jul 2007 15:53:37 -0400
Message-ID: <04d201c7bdab$d9d10540$8310590a@apac.cisco.com>
From: A S Kiran Koushik <kkoushik@cisco.com>
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, pce@ietf.org
References: <022d01c7b9d9$97dbba70$0a23fea9@your029b8cecfe>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Considering draft-vasseur-pce-monitoring-03.txt for WG status
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:53:35 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="utf-8"; reply-type="response"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jul 2007 19:53:37.0825 (UTC) FILETIME=[D8D51910:01C7BDAB]
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1097; t=1183492446; x=1184356446; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=kkoushik@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22A=20S=20Kiran=20Koushik=22=20<kkoushik@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[Pce]=20Considering=20draft-vasseur-pce-monitoring-03 .txt=20for=20WG=20status |Sender:=20; bh=DeITDrfaRlSsv0uZkkHI3LWUvNaEEJI+8wW+Fwzh6Go=; b=ADYoBQxzSiqRZPoBthxlrkJlzCC5TeM4oR+IYfohaMLLjzj/sMD6vauqKnhtXXoZ/y98an4h R2tUzburyzzYJaFU8VTjdeODBFHQFTbCMJgodG6iQbGOrOOPIFN8H39w;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=kkoushik@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 52e1467c2184c31006318542db5614d5
Cc:
X-BeenThere: pce@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: pce-bounces@lists.ietf.org

Hi,
This draft has useful information required to monitor and troubleshoot
PCEs and in conjunction with the PCE MIBs will provide an 
excellent PCE management framework.

I support that this be made a WG document.

Regards,
Kiran. 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <pce@ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 6:09 PM
Subject: [Pce] Considering draft-vasseur-pce-monitoring-03.txt for WG status


> Hi,
> 
> draft-vasseur-pce-monitoring-03.txt was updated last month to take into 
> account issues raised in Prague and on the mailing list.
> The I-D specifies procedures and extensions to PCEP in order to gather 
> information about the state of the chain of PCEs involved in a path 
> computation chain for troubleshooting and performance monitoring purposes.
> 
> Please state your opinion on whether this should become a working group 
> draft.
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce