IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06

Boris Khasanov <bhassanov@yandex-team.ru> Mon, 11 July 2022 18:42 UTC

Return-Path: <bhassanov@yandex-team.ru>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C07AC14F746; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 11:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.628
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.628 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG=0.377, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yandex-team.ru
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bpu2bP-flnFZ; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 11:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from forwardcorp1p.mail.yandex.net (forwardcorp1p.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1472:2741:0:8b6:217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C75BC06B988; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 11:42:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vla3-850de775f4df.qloud-c.yandex.net (vla3-850de775f4df.qloud-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c15:341d:0:640:850d:e775]) by forwardcorp1p.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 62B2C2E1276; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 21:42:45 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from 2a02:6b8:c0d:3192:0:640:36b7:415c (2a02:6b8:c0d:3192:0:640:36b7:415c [2a02:6b8:c0d:3192:0:640:36b7:415c]) by vla3-850de775f4df.qloud-c.yandex.net (mxbackcorp/Yandex) with HTTP id 5bZEh40LL8c1-gjLamxxZ; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 21:42:45 +0300
X-Yandex-Fwd: 2
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex-team.ru; s=default; t=1657564965; bh=HL/WYvnh3laWJlAyzdUIOo33L8u7bTpXnGytCKC/XMg=; h=Subject:In-Reply-To:Cc:Date:References:To:From:Message-Id; b=j74LuqvlE9XHUCpeT375ie+9+aSTL0gLQ5ajr9vmUbvYOdXN83OwtdK2beN7wp4Gx rfa1uz/tCejayrkv0qS2wdKQfCH7UIFHP+uWrjaVv58gHDZ1K/6AZhX3URlq/Nwaqw vFitnWnCU6N2tZdbSD2YzoLO3t5ytuBketmQ0m1c=
Authentication-Results: vla3-850de775f4df.qloud-c.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex-team.ru
Received: from sas1-bf93f9015d57.qloud-c.yandex.net (sas1-bf93f9015d57.qloud-c.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:c08:8889:0:640:bf93:f901]) by sas1-9c28cd37d27b.qloud-c.yandex.net (mxbackcorp/Yandex) with HTTP id YfZDe50JXuQ1-mSAwuSgo for <bhassanov@yandex-team.ru>; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 21:42:35 +0300
Received: by sas1-bf93f9015d57.qloud-c.yandex.net with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 21:42:35 +0300
From: Boris Khasanov <bhassanov@yandex-team.ru>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit@ietf.org" <draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAP7zK5Zp6CWFvBTKHK53B8krYZWgZKvswjfd+hBek=DikVWc-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAP7zK5Zp6CWFvBTKHK53B8krYZWgZKvswjfd+hBek=DikVWc-Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 21:42:45 +0300
Message-Id: <164031657564565@mail.yandex-team.ru>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/2zZzLQBztpogJ5Tf7HGHSWPvxWM>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 18:42:55 -0000

Hi Dhruv and all,
 
I support the adoption of the draft, I think it will be useful to extend PCEP for signaling IFIT capabilities and attributes between PCE and PCC as part of bigger IFIT framework. SR Policy is a just one use case as it was already mentioned in previous emails.
 
SY,
Boris
 
 
24.06.2022, 11:59, "Dhruv Dhody" <dd@dhruvdhody.com>:
Hi WG,

This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06.
 
 
Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list.

Please respond by Monday 11th July 2022.
 
Please be more vocal during WG polls! 

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien
,

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email