IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Pce] 答复: WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06

Aijun Wang <wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn> Fri, 01 July 2022 09:26 UTC

Return-Path: <wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26266C15AAC8; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 02:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CaiGne7L4QRB; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 02:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chinatelecom.cn (prt-mail.chinatelecom.cn [42.123.76.226]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B74C15BE8B; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 02:26:23 -0700 (PDT)
HMM_SOURCE_IP: 172.18.0.188:46530.1504527361
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: SMTP
Received: from clientip-221.223.97.163 (unknown [172.18.0.188]) by chinatelecom.cn (HERMES) with SMTP id 127622800E9; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 17:26:18 +0800 (CST)
X-189-SAVE-TO-SEND: 66040164@chinatelecom.cn
Received: from ([172.18.0.188]) by app0023 with ESMTP id 03e80c8853c44faa84d57765e14cd9d3 for dd@dhruvdhody.com; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 17:26:20 CST
X-Transaction-ID: 03e80c8853c44faa84d57765e14cd9d3
X-Real-From: wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn
X-Receive-IP: 172.18.0.188
X-MEDUSA-Status: 0
Sender: wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn
From: Aijun Wang <wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn>
To: 'Dhruv Dhody' <dd@dhruvdhody.com>, pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit@ietf.org
References: <CAP7zK5Zp6CWFvBTKHK53B8krYZWgZKvswjfd+hBek=DikVWc-Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP7zK5Zp6CWFvBTKHK53B8krYZWgZKvswjfd+hBek=DikVWc-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2022 17:26:17 +0800
Message-ID: <003601d88d2c$9f372b60$dda58220$@chinatelecom.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0037_01D88D6F.AD5DEDD0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQFVgUVopSZ2Eh/HPoY4tjUKV/meZ65vVf6A
Content-Language: zh-cn
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/__PXWFTF4l17w6S1s547pPJQbSE>
Subject: [Pce] 答复: WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2022 09:26:29 -0000

Hi, All:

 

I support its adoption.

 

One questions to the authors: 

Is it enough that only the headend support the defined iFIT capabilities? What’s the procedures when the nodes on the LSP/SR path doesn’t support the defined iFIT capabilities?

 

Aijun Wang

China Telecom

 

发件人: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:dd@dhruvdhody.com] 
发送时间: 2022年6月24日 16:59
收件人: pce@ietf.org
抄送: draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit@ietf.org
主题: WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06

 

Hi WG,

This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06.

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit/

 

Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list.

Please respond by Monday 11th July 2022.

 

Please be more vocal during WG polls! 

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email