IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06

Chongfeng XIE <xiechf@chinatelecom.cn> Sat, 02 July 2022 01:52 UTC

Return-Path: <xiechf@chinatelecom.cn>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D9C3C14CF1B; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 18:52:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B3AsKnFht6VU; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 18:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chinatelecom.cn (prt-mail.chinatelecom.cn [42.123.76.222]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3701C14CF15; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 18:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
HMM_SOURCE_IP: 172.18.0.188:59604.1894554262
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: SMTP
Received: from clientip-114.250.180.45 (unknown [172.18.0.188]) by chinatelecom.cn (HERMES) with SMTP id A68C328009C; Sat, 2 Jul 2022 09:52:30 +0800 (CST)
X-189-SAVE-TO-SEND: 66040161@chinatelecom.cn
Received: from ([172.18.0.188]) by app0023 with ESMTP id 2fe9dd30f0e24c2ab78331216b3b0866 for hayabusagsm@gmail.com; Sat, 02 Jul 2022 09:52:32 CST
X-Transaction-ID: 2fe9dd30f0e24c2ab78331216b3b0866
X-Real-From: xiechf@chinatelecom.cn
X-Receive-IP: 172.18.0.188
X-MEDUSA-Status: 0
Sender: xiechf@chinatelecom.cn
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2022 09:52:30 +0800
From: Chongfeng XIE <xiechf@chinatelecom.cn>
To: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>, Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
Cc: draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit <draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit@ietf.org>, pce <pce@ietf.org>
References: <CAP7zK5Zp6CWFvBTKHK53B8krYZWgZKvswjfd+hBek=DikVWc-Q@mail.gmail.com>, <CABNhwV0ZqEco5LFXSvR-S0mKVu6HBB7MA3b-hOvM_0J7fB3jaQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.23.121[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <202207020952299147261@chinatelecom.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart416830673102_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/l3BB32VvVvV7m261OOzC7I05G6g>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2022 01:52:41 -0000

Hi， all，
I support the adoption of this document. Thanks.

Chongfeng

On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 4:59 AM Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> wrote:
Hi WG,

This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit/

Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list.

Please respond by Monday 11th July 2022.

Please be more vocal during WG polls! 

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
-- 

Gyan Mishra
Network Solutions Architect 
Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com
M 301 502-1347

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email