Re: [Pce] WG LC for draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-01

Khasanov Boris <> Sun, 15 September 2019 07:41 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 067E3120013; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 00:41:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jP0OXFd8XGMe; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 00:41:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C22FB120019; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 00:41:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown []) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id AD46F860E323FD4DF96E; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 08:41:16 +0100 (IST)
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 08:41:11 +0100
From: Khasanov Boris <>
To: Dhruv Dhody <>, "" <>
CC: pce-chairs <>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] WG LC for draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-01
Thread-Index: AQHVX17SrmPyz7rzZEqN2l1daOivb6cscUOA
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 07:41:11 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG LC for draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-01
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 07:41:22 -0000

Hi all,

I have read  draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-01 and think it is ready for publication.
As it was mentioned, it is small but important since it closes possible interoperability issues of handling PCEP flags in SRP  object between different implementations.


-----Original Message-----
From: Pce [] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 9:14 PM
Cc: pce-chairs <>
Subject: [Pce] WG LC for draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-01

Hi WG,

This email starts a 'working group last call' for
draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-01 [1]. This I-D is focused and has an uncontroversial fix to RFC 8231, we are moving it directly to WGLC. See [2] for context.

Please indicate your support or concern for this draft.

If you are opposed to the progression of the draft, please articulate your concern.

If you support, please indicate that you have read the latest version and it is ready for publication.

As always, review comments and nits are most welcome.

The WG LC will end on 16th September 2019.

PCE Chairs


Pce mailing list