Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec
"Chengli (Cheng Li)" <c.l@huawei.com> Mon, 10 January 2022 06:40 UTC
Return-Path: <c.l@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F65E3A07AD for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Jan 2022 22:40:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s2-SmsjgArNa for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Jan 2022 22:40:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D7C43A07B2 for <pce@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Jan 2022 22:40:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fraeml735-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4JXPJ33TVlz67lD7 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:37:07 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggpemm500002.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.229) by fraeml735-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.216) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.20; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 07:40:35 +0100
Received: from dggpemm500003.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.56) by dggpemm500002.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.20; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:40:33 +0800
Received: from dggpemm500003.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.56]) by dggpemm500003.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.56]) with mapi id 15.01.2308.020; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:40:33 +0800
From: "Chengli (Cheng Li)" <c.l@huawei.com>
To: "julien.meuric@orange.com" <julien.meuric@orange.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec
Thread-Index: AQHX8pz/4eW76uxAPUCqYeOqvSzPKaxVjoWAgAZlR3A=
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 06:40:33 +0000
Message-ID: <44b96c542e5c4d20a6b48fcf2f4fd3a0@huawei.com>
References: <7f6f43c7-06fd-bc5c-97ce-12db83042c0f@orange.com> <5a43d086-fb61-5341-3bdf-1fa687e726f5@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <5a43d086-fb61-5341-3bdf-1fa687e726f5@orange.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.112.40.81]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/5mPvIUOYr4HsQGFvuablH37j16o>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 06:40:44 -0000
Hi Julien, Since the text already had WG consensus when it was part of the draft-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec, I would like to support the adoption. Thank you! Cheng -----Original Message----- From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meuric@orange.com Sent: Thursday, January 6, 2022 8:57 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec Hi all and best wishes for 2022. Gentle reminder: we started a poll some days before Christmas. If it was pure new work, I'd assume there isn't enough interest yet. Since it's pre-existing work that has been split to catch up with another WG's work in progress, I'd feel more comfortable to get some explicit feedback. Thanks, Julien On 16/12/2021 17:49, julien.meuric@orange.com wrote: > Hi all, > > This message is the following step to the situation previously > summarized by Dhruv [1]. > > As a result, do you believe that draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec [2] is > a right foundation to become (again) a PCE WG item? > > Please respond to the PCE list, including any comment you may feel > useful, especially in case of negative answer. > > Thanks, > > Julien > > (As a reminder, Dhruv recused himself from the administrative > process.) > > -- > > [1] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/4f8f_3Qs_uA3T16CTCAsoOJnt58/ > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec/
- [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flow… julien.meuric
- Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-… julien.meuric
- Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-… Zhuangshunwan
- Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-… olivier.dugeon
- Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-… julien.meuric