IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec

"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Wed, 12 January 2022 08:13 UTC

Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF943A091F for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 00:13:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pn3YZKeSg-gh for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 00:13:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33FF83A091E for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 00:13:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fraeml704-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.201]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4JYgKw2wRHz67nPb for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 16:13:08 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggeme701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.97) by fraeml704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.53) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.20; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 09:13:11 +0100
Received: from dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.100) by dggeme701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.20; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 16:13:09 +0800
Received: from dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.80.77]) by dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.80.77]) with mapi id 15.01.2308.020; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 16:13:09 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: "julien.meuric@orange.com" <julien.meuric@orange.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec
Thread-Index: AQHX8pz/3r06YN9hXEaDgiBXUHqPgKxVjoWAgAmj0XA=
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 08:13:09 +0000
Message-ID: <dbcbe3616e5d415f8a18654873cd4cb4@huawei.com>
References: <7f6f43c7-06fd-bc5c-97ce-12db83042c0f@orange.com> <5a43d086-fb61-5341-3bdf-1fa687e726f5@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <5a43d086-fb61-5341-3bdf-1fa687e726f5@orange.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.112.40.66]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/DW5BDEQEYuNt8vzOJrcto26taNE>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 08:13:21 -0000

Hi Julien,

I've read both the previous version before the split and the latest version of this document, and I support its adoption. 

Best regards,
Jie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> julien.meuric@orange.com
> Sent: Thursday, January 6, 2022 8:57 PM
> To: pce@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec
> 
> Hi all and best wishes for 2022.
> 
> Gentle reminder: we started a poll some days before Christmas. If it was pure
> new work, I'd assume there isn't enough interest yet. Since it's pre-existing
> work that has been split to catch up with another WG's work in progress, I'd
> feel more comfortable to get some explicit feedback.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Julien
> 
> 
> On 16/12/2021 17:49, julien.meuric@orange.com wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This message is the following step to the situation previously
> > summarized by Dhruv [1].
> >
> > As a result, do you believe that draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec [2] is
> > a right foundation to become (again) a PCE WG item?
> >
> > Please respond to the PCE list, including any comment you may feel
> > useful, especially in case of negative answer.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Julien
> >
> > (As a reminder, Dhruv recused himself from the administrative
> > process.)
> >
> > --
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/4f8f_3Qs_uA3T16CTCAsoOJnt58/
> > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec/
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email