IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec

julien.meuric@orange.com Thu, 16 December 2021 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4523A1181 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 08:49:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FaP6-dMzg_u7 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 08:49:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.70.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 189B43A117E for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 08:49:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from opfednr00.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.64]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by opfednr20.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTPS id 4JFJ424dfsz1yHK for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 17:49:22 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1639673362; bh=y1Y0VpJJtmlsVyQOcV+bdeLc34nbtteqPTqOEbGi6ho=; h=From:Subject:To:Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=MG3puwhNBuCrqDAGgHd2Nkyw/9xCy8gXA6P6nuISOqH4qdj5laPIkh/iUCOFWGJx+ gMSv+UzQTh2A0aCzdWBwkh4i/+gUJszv4rX9vv5E94dPHWnfiitdwUXtrhu0Pnkcds qhHBMyNJMFNvhUd6fS6Plm66Y914BzSw15ETd7CLwMmEiR9qwY5S1y3AbWJ0hwSYOT BB/TVvXkWxk2zmAe6pqpmD9wafC66a1+vAb7iPWYf5k8+pUnMPInn5bip3UVhhtEP7 XMysb65zd92692goNt1y6NPbFq64ZTqfmsDpKvlpDRcADh1ASBgRbI1cPJllbctqtz z30yuHceCIRCQ==
From: julien.meuric@orange.com
Organization: Orange
To: pce@ietf.org
Reply-To: pce@ietf.org
Message-ID: <7f6f43c7-06fd-bc5c-97ce-12db83042c0f@orange.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 17:49:15 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms040809070200010303020309"
X-Originating-IP: [10.115.27.52]
X-ClientProxiedBy: OPE16NORMBX501.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup (10.115.26.25) To OPE16NORMBX105.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup (10.115.27.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/BnpYgBsFGvScQdYaOgwhZvmphgk>
Subject: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 16:49:30 -0000

Hi all,

This message is the following step to the situation previously 
summarized by Dhruv [1].

As a result, do you believe that draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec [2] is a 
right foundation to become (again) a PCE WG item?

Please respond to the PCE list, including any comment you may feel 
useful, especially in case of negative answer.

Thanks,

Julien

(As a reminder, Dhruv recused himself from the administrative process.)

--

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/4f8f_3Qs_uA3T16CTCAsoOJnt58/
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email