IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional

Robert Varga <nite@hq.sk> Thu, 23 September 2021 19:53 UTC

Return-Path: <nite@hq.sk>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4589C3A19DF for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 12:53:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hq.sk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3T9DWGNI1b2q for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 12:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hq.sk (hq.sk [81.89.59.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B13CC3A19D8 for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 12:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.146] (chello085216197060.chello.sk [85.216.197.60]) by mail.hq.sk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C91A7243513; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 21:52:44 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hq.sk; s=mail; t=1632426764; bh=5P4I+hKjhunEtC9TtevLMkJdCZEq2+Scm5eV3WoNzm4=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=rG3pZY95DvrffrP679eQhhZgvZ1vxC8R8qK83/kJccky1PVigArawE0euR1NTMN1V EjLL5hsL1rLKN2Yi98x56DloefypH/9gKIrEdV7N9IPdcMwmZaIF6Uf35mEKaHbsom cLqHx9FTmbh1X37ec++MAplCZCoKqwHUAYkbT2SU=
Message-ID: <c92082fc-4fb9-a543-7458-5d516e37b3fe@hq.sk>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 21:52:44 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.1.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: julien.meuric@orange.com, pce@ietf.org
References: <ade32580-e0aa-e33c-784e-a73e67507cfa@orange.com>
From: Robert Varga <nite@hq.sk>
In-Reply-To: <ade32580-e0aa-e33c-784e-a73e67507cfa@orange.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------k1QDRMljAoUYf4qaNbXgky3Z"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/6oJn6xFM2bGY13-5WG3xgeqW9Wc>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 19:53:02 -0000

On 21/09/2021 16:00, julien.meuric@orange.com wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> This e-mail starts an adoption poll for 
> draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional-08 [1]. Do you consider this I-D 
> is ready to become a PCE WG item?
> 
> Please respond to the PCE list, including rationale if you believe the 
> WG should not adopt it.

Yes/adopt. This draft addresses issues not considered in scope for 
RFC8231, so is a welcome addition for any implementer.

Regards,
Robert

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email