IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional

"Yangfan(Fan,IP Standards)" <shirley.yangfan@huawei.com> Wed, 22 September 2021 06:15 UTC

Return-Path: <shirley.yangfan@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578153A20CB for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 23:15:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e9Wli_z81OgS for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 23:15:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E6083A20CA for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 23:15:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.226]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4HDnzJ58Jqz67Vq8 for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 14:13:16 +0800 (CST)
Received: from kwepeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.162) by fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.8; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 08:15:40 +0200
Received: from kwepeml500003.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.182) by kwepeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.162) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.8; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 14:15:39 +0800
Received: from kwepeml500003.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.182]) by kwepeml500003.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.182]) with mapi id 15.01.2308.008; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 14:15:39 +0800
From: "Yangfan(Fan,IP Standards)" <shirley.yangfan@huawei.com>
To: "julien.meuric@orange.com" <julien.meuric@orange.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional
Thread-Index: AQHXrvEyOFlJ6dXAskyaymMAqLmvD6uvlECQ
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 06:15:38 +0000
Message-ID: <33e49b7165774dea91d577b03c10c8ce@huawei.com>
References: <ade32580-e0aa-e33c-784e-a73e67507cfa@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <ade32580-e0aa-e33c-784e-a73e67507cfa@orange.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.112.41.70]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/B5UN7m-YjhFVbialAaBFGWTCnDU>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 06:15:50 -0000

Hi PCE,

The document provides a useful mechanism to PCEP, I support the adoption.

Cheers,
Fan 

-----Original Message-----
From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meuric@orange.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 10:01 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional

Hi all,

This e-mail starts an adoption poll for
draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional-08 [1]. Do you consider this I-D is ready to become a PCE WG item?

Please respond to the PCE list, including rationale if you believe the WG should not adopt it.

Thanks,

Dhruv & Julien


[1]
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional-08

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email