IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional

julien.meuric@orange.com Tue, 21 September 2021 14:00 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E34F3A16F2 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 07:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y6J57UGcULmr for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 07:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.70.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F7CC3A16F4 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 07:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfednr00.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.64]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by opfednr22.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTPS id 4HDNP01W1Fz10bq for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 16:00:36 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1632232836; bh=YEJBN5g6xIwTUvn+VmJcIK4MMDYhRX30sqiO7ozQ/94=; h=To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lcgTwmrtSyW0lul2xFUNV7DpQ0yQa5S9V6Tk8q5JkoL8fW8fd1gFXnrvxfCdxJtG0 oKHRIxrPVDSVkiY9SPniPRLI1qBL7cFuWuwnFKH/lyFMdEF/4KAX827oBh/rmUzFgg DAGE0GsAJq0wBE8uOz5DcbFHpLUQYngS1IT72ZzNgGItp0YUVHDDyGN7k+MwWiG+LA ti/qHQA3bspStDGMEfr6zLY58aJQkGN1Ir4migtaFCyev2oi22wlOsMjyJ0QkblE3d y3YHDT+TuhY4AfsNIh3m4b6oOUhkv6qPs6kqUykACIxertFKj1S2Zo0NOC3v8jKO6l wOoRgr2TFSyUw==
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by opfednr00.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTPS id 4HDNP00fQkzDq7Y for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 16:00:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.193.71.128] (10.114.13.247) by exchange-eme6.itn.ftgroup (10.114.13.86) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.498.0; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 16:00:35 +0200
To: pce@ietf.org
From: julien.meuric@orange.com
Organization: Orange
Message-ID: <ade32580-e0aa-e33c-784e-a73e67507cfa@orange.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 16:00:34 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms080604030909030201030308"
X-Originating-IP: [10.114.13.247]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/FTHeNXrFZMgqL1J3pbPxCPaNLRE>
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 14:00:47 -0000

Hi all,

This e-mail starts an adoption poll for 
draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional-08 [1]. Do you consider this I-D 
is ready to become a PCE WG item?

Please respond to the PCE list, including rationale if you believe the 
WG should not adopt it.

Thanks,

Dhruv & Julien


[1] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional-08

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email