IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-09

"Xufeng Liu" <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 30 June 2016 15:53 UTC

Return-Path: <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8028A12D182; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 08:53:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PbkT9n7i5fgI; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 08:53:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22c.google.com (mail-wm0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB73912D11B; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 08:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id r201so125121864wme.1; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 08:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:thread-index:content-language; bh=4AKxqF+4s/0puNwiZkxXlKABQpFKG1MJ/zs6/uwxg+w=; b=V/QEE4NKZALc6hLnSscNQUaI3rh7uYuAnq7TVpfgkrsicm5Yfc24blVUGTGn2kp+U7 8460CCxCRY4ss+CWOm6yFWK+ynaYno30lGMX61Duo7Frb/q1rD9kb2BPiJxf6wbwUXM0 xIj9U1zJDhcog+lZI+xQxkpx4EtPys+Ua8tM8RbCs2CnsaWqfTBv8cX/cV6l0Q+h83nF 3aZCl4fqEFL/Z4wAvTmjKmIA2x1zaECkPL2DObxWYQGC3MQbe/FuOF1Axl0IYgSEQe+7 GKaoiSWcTZ1xp6AXw+mY9CVWw8SMjkSeDleEQctUGk1QZo84msIUin2UmlIDM6shNsfs I9WA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:thread-index:content-language; bh=4AKxqF+4s/0puNwiZkxXlKABQpFKG1MJ/zs6/uwxg+w=; b=Ujg8d9/8AbPbnDutZWpEx4fXmdk4L6zlVQGWNC4c/ezYXNSFNJA5DSEbsVc9fFdyR4 6/DD0M/ZuVZDxr1dkiK/qGZWETP9YQO3zX7hz3rn/LQ3B3qv9hpmVXzfwljxWJ0Jq+pQ ioNU6IGcq8I2lCpWp86TBpFyGEt8aBjddvZVhPro9A7QkWl1DsNbcgHNp/DWrRHvD49Y ZIZNmX8DwjR6U/vISWl/dHKHDWUKo9Y5S/J3DLQKX4VIs2qnDKv0260IZjLM2IYmho/o c7oPCERnJYOzJtg7nnnc0m8ObC3TSg5rbxU+RijlXA9PZJt1TTGgo3opSUF/LRtJ9JXC R7Lw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIyhhUiOrvAeFBmtXBKSLchD/OaDkz0F3mvLrouZlZNj1cijQWXOUcQT2hxjLMdrA==
X-Received: by 10.28.173.8 with SMTP id w8mr26737965wme.39.1467301999310; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 08:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xliuus (ip72-209-195-86.dc.dc.cox.net. [72.209.195.86]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r6sm4732047wme.14.2016.06.30.08.53.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 30 Jun 2016 08:53:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
To: 'Jonathan Hardwick' <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com>, pce@ietf.org
References: <0E699626-7EFB-4A3C-A827-C409613C7D3B@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <0E699626-7EFB-4A3C-A827-C409613C7D3B@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 11:53:18 -0400
Message-ID: <00e101d1d2e7$865d6100$93182300$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00E2_01D1D2C5.FF4CF980"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQFt6pWIVsjt2shV16Mio6AJNzzdNaDJ+ZJA
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/AkgOTISFSA5dy4XhMtH5cnLuxCI>
Cc: draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp@ietf.org, pce-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-09
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:53:23 -0000

yes/support

 

Regards,

 

- Xufeng

 

From: Pce <pce-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org> > on behalf of Jonathan Hardwick <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com <mailto:Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com> >
Date: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 at 12:59 PM
To: "pce@ietf.org <mailto:pce@ietf.org> " <pce@ietf.org <mailto:pce@ietf.org> >
Cc: "draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp@ietf.org <mailto:draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp@ietf.org> " <draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp@ietf.org <mailto:draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp@ietf.org> >, "pce-chairs@ietf.org <mailto:pce-chairs@ietf.org> " <pce-chairs@ietf.org <mailto:pce-chairs@ietf.org> >
Subject: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-09

 

All,

 

This is start of a two week poll on making draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-09 a PCE working group document.  This draft fills a gap in explaining how stateful PCE can be applied to P2MP paths.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp/

 

Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating “yes/support” or “no/do not support”.  If indicating no, please state your reasons.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.

 

The poll ends on Tuesday July 12.

 

Thanks,

Jon, JP and Julien

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email