IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-09

Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com> Tue, 28 June 2016 23:02 UTC

Return-Path: <leeyoung@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D8E612D949; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.644
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.644 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4GtjcD3pV_6a; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:02:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 546BE12D87F; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CRS52352; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 23:02:10 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DFWEML702-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.176) by lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:02:09 +0100
Received: from DFWEML501-MBX.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.178]) by dfweml702-cah.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.176]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:02:04 -0700
From: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>
To: Jonathan Hardwick <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Poll for adoption: draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-09
Thread-Index: AdHRXl52TzypF54zRPyvUmWL/V6z6wAMqnaQ
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 23:02:04 +0000
Message-ID: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E172A89F94A@dfweml501-mbx>
References: <BLUPR0201MB190802AB206F06E394A8AECC84220@BLUPR0201MB1908.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BLUPR0201MB190802AB206F06E394A8AECC84220@BLUPR0201MB1908.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.83.251]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E172A89F94Adfweml501mbx_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020206.577301F3.0081, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: fdd4ea154a36c2ae574ff721c848e055
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/XnUBGws8lBRKQw4Fn6SwypPQIMo>
Cc: "draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp@ietf.org" <draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp@ietf.org>, "pce-chairs@ietf.org" <pce-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-09
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 23:02:17 -0000

Yes/support.

Young

From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 11:59 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp@ietf.org; pce-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-09


All,



This is start of a two week poll on making draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-09 a PCE working group document.  This draft fills a gap in explaining how stateful PCE can be applied to P2MP paths.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp/



Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state your reasons.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.



The poll ends on Tuesday July 12.



Thanks,

Jon, JP and Julien

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email