Re: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-09

Yosuke Tanaka <yosuke.tanaka@ntt.com> Tue, 28 June 2016 23:56 UTC

Return-Path: <yosuke.tanaka@ntt.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5952F12D91A; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:56:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YCiScJVWg_uL; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:56:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw020.noc.ntt.com (mgw020.noc.ntt.com [210.160.55.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 858D112D5C4; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c0044i0.coe.ntt.com (c0044i0.nc.agilit-hosting.com [10.18.161.13]) by mgw020.noc.ntt.com (NTT Com MailSV) with ESMTP id AB18D44602F6; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 08:56:40 +0900 (JST)
Received: from C0035I0.coe.ntt.com (10.18.160.39) by c0044i0.coe.ntt.com (10.18.161.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.181.6; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 08:56:40 +0900
Received: from C0562I0.coe.ntt.com ([169.254.2.192]) by C0035I0.coe.ntt.com ([10.18.160.39]) with mapi id 14.03.0181.006; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 08:56:39 +0900
From: Yosuke Tanaka <yosuke.tanaka@ntt.com>
To: Jonathan Hardwick <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Poll for adoption: draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-09
Thread-Index: AdHRXl52TzypF54zRPyvUmWL/V6z6wAOj4TA
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 23:56:38 +0000
Message-ID: <4382467A240ADE4C8552523C24D51B5758CB4FE0@C0562I0.coe.ntt.com>
References: <BLUPR0201MB190802AB206F06E394A8AECC84220@BLUPR0201MB1908.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BLUPR0201MB190802AB206F06E394A8AECC84220@BLUPR0201MB1908.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: ja-JP, en-US
Content-Language: ja-JP
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ccmail-original-to: Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com, pce@ietf.org
x-ccmail-original-cc: draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp@ietf.org, pce-chairs@ietf.org
x-originating-ip: [10.26.102.165]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4382467A240ADE4C8552523C24D51B5758CB4FE0C0562I0coenttco_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/aCvRq6oOca69e1BuB2jerEChGRo>
Cc: "draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp@ietf.org" <draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp@ietf.org>, "pce-chairs@ietf.org" <pce-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-09
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 23:56:45 -0000

Yes/support

Regards,
Yosuke Tanaka

From: Jonathan Hardwick [mailto:Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 1:59 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp@ietf.org; pce-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Poll for adoption: draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-09


All,



This is start of a two week poll on making draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-09 a PCE working group document.  This draft fills a gap in explaining how stateful PCE can be applied to P2MP paths.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp/



Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating “yes/support” or “no/do not support”.  If indicating no, please state your reasons.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.



The poll ends on Tuesday July 12.



Thanks,

Jon, JP and Julien