IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] PCE WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pce-pceps-04

Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com> Thu, 19 November 2015 09:25 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066151B307B for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 01:25:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.469
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.469 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jW7jQqBI0TqL for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 01:25:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p-mail2.rd.orange.com (p-mail2.rd.orange.com [161.106.1.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DDF41B3076 for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 01:25:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p-mail2.rd.orange.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 50550E300A3; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 10:25:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: from FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.194.32.11]) by p-mail2.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C9DE30090; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 10:25:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.193.71.204] (10.193.71.204) by FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (10.194.32.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 10:25:29 +0100
To: DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA <diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com>
References: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B8C435C02@BLREML509-MBX.china.huawei.com> <00bb01d1172a$1fcc4100$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <B46D90DD-D634-4832-90F5-1A9DC1E45760@telefonica.com> <01ea01d11eda$b1243920$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <4B3520A0-F710-4AE6-80F5-D2551600637E@telefonica.com>
From: Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>
Organization: Orange
Message-ID: <564D9593.6090204@orange.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 10:25:39 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4B3520A0-F710-4AE6-80F5-D2551600637E@telefonica.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/D8HmKwfwzs9hrNdG13om9N2FMSs>
Cc: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Pce] PCE WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pce-pceps-04
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 09:25:42 -0000

Hola Diego,

The WG LC was started for a 2-week period: you can consider it finished.

Finished or not, you are expected to resolve all the received comments 
and publish an update accordingly, so as to have the I-D ready to be 
sent to the IESG. Feel free to proceed as soon as you are able to.

Cheers,

Julien


Nov. 18, 2015 - diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com:
>
> And let me insist that I’d directly ask the UTA WG about this. My only 
> question is about procedure: shall we wait till we finish the last 
> call period? Shall we perform it as part of the last call process? 
> What do our chairs think?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email