Re: [Pce] PCE WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pce-pceps-04

Hi Cyril,

Thanks for your review and comments. Much Appreciated.

Let me sink up with my co-authors and reply to you with a proposed text.

Regards,
Dhruv

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:07 AM, Cyril Margaria <cyril.margaria@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I have reviewed the id.
>
> I think the document describes well the TLS  procedure.
>
> I have the following comments/questions on the nonTLS support: what should
> a PCE peer  do when the error code "pcep startTLS failure" and error value
> 3 or 4.
>
> For error value 3 i believe closing the connection shoud be done
> For error code 4 (ok without TLS) should the peer:
>
> A)Continue without TLS at all
>
> B) close and reconnect without using tls
>
> A) would require more descrption of that case. B) would require the peer
> to retry without tls or require a reconfiguration. The reconnect introduces
> more states (how long to keep retrying withiut tls,... etc)
>
> I think those points should be specified.
>
> Best regards
> Cyril
> On Oct 8, 2015 18:57, "JP Vasseur (jvasseur)" <jvasseur@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear WG,
>>
>> This starts a 2-week WG Last Call on draft-ietf-pce-pceps-04, ending on
>> Oct 23 at noon ET. Please send your comments to the authors and copy the
>> list.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> JP, Julien and Jon.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pce mailing list
>> Pce@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
>