Re: [Pce] PCE WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pce-pceps-04

Hi Dhruv,

If you expect some updates after a review from the Security Directorate, 
then the sooner the better. If you feel it useful, we will proceed when 
your next revision is published.

Thanks for being proactive here,

Julien

Nov. 19, 2015 - dhruv.dhody@huawei.com:
> Hi Julien,
>
> We have the update ready to go.
>
> Quoting from Tom's mail -
>
>> So I value the early intervention of the
>> Security Directorate to try and fix such
>> issues sooner, and so cheaper, rather than later.
>
> We were wondering if it would be worthwhile (and allowed by the process) to request for an early Sec-Dir review while the control is still with the WG?
>
> Regards,
> Dhruv
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric
>> Sent: 19 November 2015 14:56
>>
>> Hola Diego,
>>
>> The WG LC was started for a 2-week period: you can consider it finished.
>>
>> Finished or not, you are expected to resolve all the received comments and
>> publish an update accordingly, so as to have the I-D ready to be sent to the
>> IESG. Feel free to proceed as soon as you are able to.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Julien
>>
>>
>> Nov. 18, 2015 - diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com:
>>>
>>> And let me insist that I'd directly ask the UTA WG about this. My only
>>> question is about procedure: shall we wait till we finish the last
>>> call period? Shall we perform it as part of the last call process?
>>> What do our chairs think?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pce mailing list
>> Pce@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce