IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04

"Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com> Fri, 18 May 2018 15:44 UTC

Return-Path: <rgandhi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8582412DA6C; Fri, 18 May 2018 08:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -12.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K1L-0XuHZyou; Fri, 18 May 2018 08:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DBA712DA4E; Fri, 18 May 2018 08:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=28732; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1526658293; x=1527867893; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=y9+A5ArwcUUnrajpCNEVOIf9PofbM4sberdFH5aM0Jw=; b=PZ4KFXVxcujyb5NU3ALtsez9UYf3Iv7yzqmD2H/DtEvLo5qPQwsrQtRM AQ61qVddEjZa2Ai8HpEfxZAMLZi+KFvsEsDS091d+/N8alomlWWjz+tCa 7N6h4HI3iB/4TjP/rROE44DWNRpfu3FFttz+PSsMNFNu4HZWWQFIu89fD 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DvAACg9P5a/5ldJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJNdmF9KAqDaogEjHeBeYEPkzYUgWQLGAEJhEoCGoF3ITQYAQIBAQEBAQECbBwMhSgBAQEEAQEhSwsQAgEIEQMBAQEhBwMCAgIlCxQJCAEBBAENBYMjAoEbZA+oG4IcH4gfgiIFiDWBVD+BDyOCaYMRAQECAQEWgQ4FARIBPxaCSjCCJAKHPIlYhzgJAoVoiG2BN4NthkiBEYlfhnECERMBgSQBHDgmO3FwFTsqAYIYgXCEDIUUhT5vAQGNR4EfgRgBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,415,1520899200"; d="scan'208,217";a="116049811"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 May 2018 15:44:52 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-016.cisco.com (xch-rcd-016.cisco.com [173.37.102.26]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w4IFipJV008577 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 18 May 2018 15:44:51 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-018.cisco.com (173.36.7.28) by XCH-RCD-016.cisco.com (173.37.102.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Fri, 18 May 2018 10:44:51 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-018.cisco.com ([173.36.7.28]) by XCH-ALN-018.cisco.com ([173.36.7.28]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Fri, 18 May 2018 10:44:51 -0500
From: "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com>
To: "Mike Taillon (mtaillon)" <mtaillon@cisco.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>, "draft-barth-pce-association-bidir@ietf.org" <draft-barth-pce-association-bidir@ietf.org>, "pce-chairs@ietf.org" <pce-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04
Thread-Index: AdPQ1K+dRZlrFVm2SGushMxlPX46zgCp8Q3QAC+YuwAGoyxxAA==
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 15:44:51 +0000
Message-ID: <04168C07-9C42-4AC3-B2F6-2E5A80D1BA2B@cisco.com>
References: <CY1PR0201MB143666BCBBFB5C00E0073E4284BE0@CY1PR0201MB1436.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <CY1PR05MB25217326794F657B3F99A8B8ABB30@CY1PR05MB2521.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <909BB68C-356E-410C-9119-64481A4188FE@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <909BB68C-356E-410C-9119-64481A4188FE@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1d.0.161209
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.87.151]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_04168C079C424AC3B2F62E5A80D1BA2Bciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/HkU4ibxTqgA4PA2RE2z08mIR8eA>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 15:44:56 -0000

Hi Mike,


Thank you for your review of the document.



Please see inline with <RG>…

From: "=SMTP:mtaillon@cisco. com" <mtaillon@cisco.com>
Date: Saturday, April 14, 2018 at 12:52 PM
To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>, "draft-barth-pce-association-bidir@ietf.org" <draft-barth-pce-association-bidir@ietf.org>, "pce-chairs@ietf.org" <pce-chairs@ietf.org>
Cc: Jonathan Hardwick <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com>, Ravi Singh <ravis@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04
Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org>
Resent-To: "=SMTP:rgandhi@cisco. com" <rgandhi@cisco.com>, <bin_wen@cable.comcast.com>
Resent-Date: Saturday, April 14, 2018 at 12:52 PM

Hi

Support.

Comments. (Sorry if already raised — am new to the mailer)

4.2 — please clarify that TLV is indeed optional
           o If the Bidirectional LSP Association Group TLV is missing, it

      means the LSP is the forward LSP.
    — does this imply optional in forward direction only ?

<RG> Updated Section 4.2 with additional details.

— How is this association used during reporting/delegation ?  For single sided, is a single PCRpt used for both directions ?

<RG> Updated Section 3.1 with details and added Figures 2A and 2B.

--------------
Perhaps out of scope of this document:

— For single sided, its not clear how the REVERSE_LSP object is determined.   Is this returned via PCEP from the PCE ?

<RG> Updated Section 3.1 with details.

Revised document can be found at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-01

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-01

Welcome any additional review comments and suggestions you may have.

Thanks,
Rakesh


-mike

On Apr 13, 2018, at 7:09 PM, Ravi Singh <ravis@juniper.net<mailto:ravis@juniper.net>> wrote:

Hi
Yes/support.

Ravi


From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 7:05 AM
To: pce@ietf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org>; draft-barth-pce-association-bidir@ietf.org<mailto:draft-barth-pce-association-bidir@ietf.org>
Cc: pce-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:pce-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04

Dear PCE WG

This is the start of a two week poll on making draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04 a PCE working group document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-barth-pce-association-bidir/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dbarth-2Dpce-2Dassociation-2Dbidir_&d=DwMFAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=6ArkE4n20mNZQF6JxrMYwJyAGBWWjzhSIC2O3-fXPV4&m=zZvcysHnjvmDB_Wpm9RJVZtjLzUOK_I9es23IsFAuHE&s=R6dZ1JkRnNd2Nrd9OJIjRhLk4Ngkw5jReHfNX8tKFNQ&e=>

Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating “yes/support” or “no/do not support”.  If indicating no, please state your reasons.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.

The poll ends on Tuesday, April 24.

Many thanks,

Jon and Julien


_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org<mailto:Pce@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email