Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04
Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com> Mon, 16 April 2018 09:06 UTC
Return-Path: <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B15E91275AB; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 02:06:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FzgibhnbKlSW; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 02:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E60E4124239; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 02:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 92BC33EE181AB; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:06:21 +0100 (IST)
Received: from BLREML703-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.20.4.172) by lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.48) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.382.0; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:06:22 +0100
Received: from BLREML503-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.12.113]) by blreml703-cah.china.huawei.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0382.000; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 14:36:13 +0530
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
To: Jonathan Hardwick <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>, "draft-barth-pce-association-bidir@ietf.org" <draft-barth-pce-association-bidir@ietf.org>
CC: "pce-chairs@ietf.org" <pce-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04
Thread-Index: AdPQ1K+dRZlrFVm2SGushMxlPX46zgEiN3Cg
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:06:13 +0000
Message-ID: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B8D681080@BLREML503-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <CY1PR0201MB143666BCBBFB5C00E0073E4284BE0@CY1PR0201MB1436.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CY1PR0201MB143666BCBBFB5C00E0073E4284BE0@CY1PR0201MB1436.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.18.149.39]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B8D681080BLREML503MBSchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/rTZh-MiEWavIsB7OBP1Fr4pyIjs>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:06:27 -0000
Support! A few comments that can be handled in the later versions (1) An error handling when this condition is not met - o An LSP can not be part of more than one Bidirectional LSP Association Group. (2) Update the section 2.1 with new template based on RFC8174 (3) In section 3.1, add clarity on who reports the reverse LSP LSP2, the remote endpoint D or the originating node A? Need to consider deletion and status down as well. (4) Clarification on if more than one forward and reverse LSP can be part of the association group (5) A word on association source maybe simply a reference to [I-D.ietf-pce-association] will do! Thanks! Dhruv From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick Sent: 10 April 2018 19:35 To: pce@ietf.org; draft-barth-pce-association-bidir@ietf.org Cc: pce-chairs@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04 Dear PCE WG This is the start of a two week poll on making draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04 a PCE working group document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-barth-pce-association-bidir/ Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your reasons. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document. The poll ends on Tuesday, April 24. Many thanks, Jon and Julien
- [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-associ… Jonathan Hardwick
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-as… Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-as… Colby Barth
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-as… Wen, Bin
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-as… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-as… Tarek Saad (tsaad)
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-as… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-as… Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-as… Ravi Singh
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-as… Mike Taillon (mtaillon)
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-as… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-as… Leeyoung
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-as… Jonathan Hardwick
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-as… Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-as… Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)