IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04

"Mike Taillon (mtaillon)" <mtaillon@cisco.com> Sat, 14 April 2018 16:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mtaillon@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C0B6127077; Sat, 14 Apr 2018 09:52:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -12.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ss9guaFGTMgX; Sat, 14 Apr 2018 09:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD3AA127076; Sat, 14 Apr 2018 09:52:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=19148; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1523724736; x=1524934336; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=xJDtK4JYCKw3bRlANBndDHQSUD+Tr7BJF757WLT5DT0=; b=mitWqEQYxnwRUQs+Xm7bFBkOp0ttzfQJk9tGIVibNtv5Q7dA1JAUiGHs xUrmSQjLnpeAQP2htmt7g42VyQqdjX6kkgzlE5mhxlJ1h99vD4SgvJlB9 NTBnFK1r4LnqQUkCyW83mNy/Iq9VtaxSFERAlBx83u7+pgVwfVuiBjiCF E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0COAQBbMdJa/5hdJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJNdWEXYygKg1yIAo0SgVMhgQ+NfoRqFIFnCxgBCYRhAhqCEyE0GAECAQEBAQEBAmwcDIUiAQEBAQMBASFLCxACAQgRBAEBKAMCAgIlCxQJCAEBBAENBYQpZA+maoIciD2CKgWIBoFUP4EPIwyCXIMRAQECAQEWgQ4FARIBVYJKMIIkAocuiTOHAwgChVeIYoEzg1yGLIEQiSyGTAIREwGBJAEcOCY7cXAVOyoBghiBcIQMhRSFPm8BAYxzgR+BFwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.48,450,1517875200"; d="scan'208,217";a="384248670"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Apr 2018 16:52:13 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-019.cisco.com (xch-rcd-019.cisco.com [173.37.102.29]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w3EGqDrb021544 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 14 Apr 2018 16:52:13 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-019.cisco.com (173.36.7.29) by XCH-RCD-019.cisco.com (173.37.102.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Sat, 14 Apr 2018 11:52:12 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-019.cisco.com ([173.36.7.29]) by XCH-ALN-019.cisco.com ([173.36.7.29]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Sat, 14 Apr 2018 11:52:12 -0500
From: "Mike Taillon (mtaillon)" <mtaillon@cisco.com>
To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>, "draft-barth-pce-association-bidir@ietf.org" <draft-barth-pce-association-bidir@ietf.org>, "pce-chairs@ietf.org" <pce-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04
Thread-Index: AdPQ1K+dRZlrFVm2SGushMxlPX46zgCp8Q3QAC+YuwA=
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2018 16:52:12 +0000
Message-ID: <909BB68C-356E-410C-9119-64481A4188FE@cisco.com>
References: <CY1PR0201MB143666BCBBFB5C00E0073E4284BE0@CY1PR0201MB1436.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <CY1PR05MB25217326794F657B3F99A8B8ABB30@CY1PR05MB2521.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CY1PR05MB25217326794F657B3F99A8B8ABB30@CY1PR05MB2521.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.100.147]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_909BB68C356E410C911964481A4188FEciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/qp_4QYozOI7Ct8L_tm095ZAYaMs>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2018 16:52:19 -0000

Hi

Support.


Comments. (Sorry if already raised — am new to the mailer)

4.2 — please clarify that TLV is indeed optional
           o If the Bidirectional LSP Association Group TLV is missing, it

      means the LSP is the forward LSP.


    — does this imply optional in forward direction only ?



— How is this association used during reporting/delegation ?  For single sided, is a single PCRpt used for both directions ?


--------------
Perhaps out of scope of this document:

— For single sided, its not clear how the REVERSE_LSP object is determined.   Is this returned via PCEP from the PCE ?

-mike

On Apr 13, 2018, at 7:09 PM, Ravi Singh <ravis@juniper.net<mailto:ravis@juniper.net>> wrote:

Hi
Yes/support.

Ravi


From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 7:05 AM
To: pce@ietf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org>; draft-barth-pce-association-bidir@ietf.org<mailto:draft-barth-pce-association-bidir@ietf.org>
Cc: pce-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:pce-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04

Dear PCE WG

This is the start of a two week poll on making draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04 a PCE working group document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-barth-pce-association-bidir/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dbarth-2Dpce-2Dassociation-2Dbidir_&d=DwMFAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=6ArkE4n20mNZQF6JxrMYwJyAGBWWjzhSIC2O3-fXPV4&m=zZvcysHnjvmDB_Wpm9RJVZtjLzUOK_I9es23IsFAuHE&s=R6dZ1JkRnNd2Nrd9OJIjRhLk4Ngkw5jReHfNX8tKFNQ&e=>

Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating “yes/support” or “no/do not support”.  If indicating no, please state your reasons.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.

The poll ends on Tuesday, April 24.

Many thanks,

Jon and Julien


_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org<mailto:Pce@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email