Re: [Pce] Adopting draft-lee-pce-global-concurrent-optimization-04.txt as a WG document ?
JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com> Mon, 18 June 2007 14:07 UTC
Return-path: <pce-bounces@lists.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I0HtL-0002jp-Vx; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 10:07:39 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I0HtK-0002jk-O8 for pce@ietf.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 10:07:38 -0400
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.102.122.149]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I0HtJ-0000eT-DF for pce@ietf.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 10:07:38 -0400
Received: from rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com ([64.102.121.158]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Jun 2007 10:07:37 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.16,435,1175486400"; d="scan'208"; a="123898174:sNHT138984358"
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l5IE7btU020588; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 10:07:37 -0400
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l5IE7961005718; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:07:37 GMT
Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 18 Jun 2007 10:07:21 -0400
Received: from [10.86.104.180] ([10.86.104.180]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 18 Jun 2007 10:07:20 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1181922835.4672b613b90d9@www.imp.polymtl.ca>
References: <991B1574-7163-4B0F-A46E-F2D884BDB682@cisco.com> <1181573369.466d60f9583ab@www.imp.polymtl.ca> <18233BB2-3F21-4F59-98C3-A99124E3103A@cisco.com> <1181922835.4672b613b90d9@www.imp.polymtl.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <FD4CB391-06C8-4AE2-9EBA-AB92EE68AEA7@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adopting draft-lee-pce-global-concurrent-optimization-04.txt as a WG document ?
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 10:06:58 -0400
To: Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@polymtl.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Jun 2007 14:07:20.0777 (UTC) FILETIME=[FC8CEB90:01C7B1B1]
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=2225; t=1182175657; x=1183039657; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim1001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=jvasseur@cisco.com; z=From:=20JP=20Vasseur=20<jvasseur@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[Pce]=20Adopting=20draft-lee-pce-global-concurrent-op timization-04.txt=09as=20a=20WG=20document=20? |Sender:=20 |To:=20Meral=20Shirazipour=20<meral.shirazipour@polymtl.ca>; bh=XT/l+lcoBMq6Zd5i1axXkbPPx0sdR3z9HKZe/YLK1SQ=; b=IT/0EjME3wixeFQejDPWOhnpJ1tMzXMDYhXwbdwzR4+8wMY/u0tA0lH3QBLZxp+W7fmIQgMa CbB0qnPU02O6sY0ZqEmSPxlBRjUkTkv6dbY5NpLAskgNs69M8hbzBroJ;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-1; header.From=jvasseur@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim1001 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8de5f93cb2b4e3bee75302e9eacc33db
Cc: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: pce@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: pce-bounces@lists.ietf.org
Hi Meral, On Jun 15, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Meral Shirazipour wrote: > Hi, > Thank you for the answer. But I still think any optimization > application draft > should refer to the others, even if it is only one sentence to say > that there > are no dependencies. Please suggest to the authors. > Also, since each optimization application draft will > probably propose similar extensions to PCEP, it would be better, at > least from > an implementation point of view, to generalize these extensions > instead of > making them application specific. > "generalize" ? Thanks. JP. > Cordially, > Meral > > > > > > > Selon JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>: > >> Hi Meral, >> >> On Jun 11, 2007, at 10:49 AM, Meral Shirazipour wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> I would support this draft based on its content, but I only see one >>> problem: it >>> does not consider or even refer to draft-ietf-pce-brpc-04.txt (or >>> maybe I >>> missed it?). >>> I would rather see a single draft covering all possible optimization >>> scenarios/solutions based on the PCE architecture. >>> >> >> BRPC is a multi-PCE path computation technique used to compute a >> shortest constrained >> inter-domain path wheres this ID specifies a (preferably) NMS based >> technique where a >> set of path computation requests are bundled and send to a PCE with >> the objective of >> "optimizing" the set of computed paths. >> >>> Having several IDs for optimization applications is ok as long as >>> they refer to >>> each other and maybe provide an <inter-working> section between the >>> different >>> methods. >> >> There is no real reason for referring to each other since there is no >> dependency. >> >> Thanks. >> >> JP. >> >>> >>> Cordially, >>> Meral >>> >>> >>> >>> Selon JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>: >>> >>>> Dear WG, >>>> >>>> Do you support the adoption of draft-lee-pce-global-concurrent- >>>> optimization-04.txt as a Working Group document ? >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> JP. >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pce mailing list >>>> Pce@lists.ietf.org >>>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce >>>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
- [Pce] Adopting draft-lee-pce-global-concurrent-op… JP Vasseur
- Re: [Pce] Adopting draft-lee-pce-global-concurren… Dan Li
- RE: [Pce] Adopting draft-lee-pce-global-concurren… Lucy Yong
- Re: [Pce] Adopting draft-lee-pce-global-concurren… Kohei Shiomoto
- Re: [Pce] Adopting draft-lee-pce-global-concurren… Tomonori TAKEDA
- Re: [Pce] Adopting draft-lee-pce-global-concurren… Mach Chen
- Re: [Pce] Adopting draft-lee-pce-global-concurren… inoue.ichiro@lab.ntt.co.jp
- RE: [Pce] Adopting draft-lee-pce-global-concurren… Dean Cheng (dcheng)
- Re: [Pce] Adopting draft-lee-pce-global-concurren… Greg Bernstein
- Re: [Pce] Adopting draft-lee-pce-global-concurren… Meral Shirazipour
- Re: [Pce] Adopting draft-lee-pce-global-concurren… Thomas Morin
- Re: [Pce] Adopting draft-lee-pce-global-concurren… JP Vasseur
- Re: [Pce] Adopting draft-lee-pce-global-concurren… Meral Shirazipour
- Re: [Pce] Adoptingdraft-lee-pce-global-concurrent… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Pce] Adopting draft-lee-pce-global-concurren… JP Vasseur