Re: [Pce] Adopting draft-lee-pce-global-concurrent-optimization-04.txt as a WG document ?

Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@polymtl.ca> Mon, 11 June 2007 14:53 UTC

Return-path: <pce-bounces@lists.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HxlGf-0000E9-G8; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:53:17 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HxlGd-0000Af-L5 for pce@ietf.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:53:15 -0400
Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca ([132.207.4.11]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HxlD2-0001Zc-Br for pce@ietf.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:49:33 -0400
Received: from localhost (imp-4-3.polymtl.ca [132.207.4.78]) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5BEnUbK003739; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:49:30 -0400
Received: from chaplin.larim.polymtl.ca (chaplin.larim.polymtl.ca [132.207.67.80]) by www.imp.polymtl.ca (IMP) with HTTP for <meshi@132.207.4.132>; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:49:29 -0400
Message-ID: <1181573369.466d60f9583ab@www.imp.polymtl.ca>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:49:29 -0400
From: Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@polymtl.ca>
To: JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adopting draft-lee-pce-global-concurrent-optimization-04.txt as a WG document ?
References: <991B1574-7163-4B0F-A46E-F2D884BDB682@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <991B1574-7163-4B0F-A46E-F2D884BDB682@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.3
X-Originating-IP: 132.207.67.80
X-Poly-FromMTA: (imp-4-3.polymtl.ca [132.207.4.78]) at Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:49:30 +0000
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 97adf591118a232206bdb5a27b217034
Cc: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: pce@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: pce-bounces@lists.ietf.org

Hi,
I would support this draft based on its content, but I only see one problem: it
does not consider or even refer to draft-ietf-pce-brpc-04.txt (or maybe I
missed it?).
I would rather see a single draft covering all possible optimization
scenarios/solutions based on the PCE architecture.
Having several IDs for optimization applications is ok as long as they refer to
each other and maybe provide an <inter-working> section between the different
methods.

Cordially,
Meral



Selon JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>:

> Dear WG,
>
> Do you support the adoption of draft-lee-pce-global-concurrent-
> optimization-04.txt as a Working Group document ?
>
> Thanks.
>
> JP.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>




_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce